Democrat voter fraud is on!

[dawg80]

Barr has made a tactical decision, to get something else he wants and that he thinks he has a realistic chance of getting.

As for the other, well, Barr says the evidence he has seen amounts to fraud, just not enough fraud in one state, or a couple of states, to change the overall results. That does not mean there was not fraud.

I know the anti-trumpers are celebrating and haven't stop long enough to think about other matters. But, maybe the whole notion of voter fraud, at any level, in any amount will finally resonate with the TDS crowd and some of them will say, know what, voter fraud is not good and cannot be defended. We need to fix this.

[inudesu]

But, maybe the whole notion of voter fraud, at any level, in any amount will finally resonate with the TDS crowd and some of them will say, know what, voter fraud is not good and cannot be defended. We need to fix this.

Is that what's been happening over the last several weeks, do you think? A systematic examination of any and all possible fraudulent and/or non-fraudulent but erroneous voting discrepancies? Motivated and executed in pure good faith in an attempt to clean up voting across the board?

While the other side (and much of the same side) has argued that fraud is good and welcome?

Because that's not the vibe I've been getting.

Millions of dollars have been raised, on the other hand. And lots of people have been convinced that the system doesn't work (if they don't get the outcome they wanted/were sold). And a LOT of ad space has been sold on OAN and Newsmax (and Fox and CNN and MSNBC) while on one hand people made things up and sold them as truth, and on the other hand other people debunked like mad, just to get hit with another implausible theory to debunk (which is still good for business if bad for democracy). And some lawyers got paid. And some signals got boosted (this may be the worst part). And quite a bit of intra-party squabbling and boxing out with a view towards lower level positions. All pretty gross.

It seems that the liberals at The National Review have maybe not seen the last few weeks as efforts to that effect either.

https://www.nationalreview.com/2020/...ceful-endgame/

[johnnylightnin]

As for the other, well, Barr says the evidence he has seen amounts to fraud...

No, he didn’t.

[johnnylightnin]

Is that what's been happening over the last several weeks, do you think? A systematic examination of any and all possible fraudulent and/or non-fraudulent but erroneous voting discrepancies? Motivated and executed in pure good faith in an attempt to clean up voting across the board?

While the other side (and much of the same side) has argued that fraud is good and welcome?

Because that's not the vibe I've been getting.

Millions of dollars have been raised, on the other hand. And lots of people have been convinced that the system doesn't work (if they don't get the outcome they wanted/were sold). And a LOT of ad space has been sold on OAN and Newsmax (and Fox and CNN and MSNBC) while on one hand people made things up and sold them as truth, and on the other hand other people debunked like mad, just to get hit with another implausible theory to debunk (which is still good for business if bad for democracy). And some lawyers got paid. And some signals got boosted (this may be the worst part). And quite a bit of intra-party squabbling and boxing out with a view towards lower level positions. All pretty gross.

It seems that the liberals at The National Review have maybe not seen the last few weeks as efforts to that effect either.

https://www.nationalreview.com/2020/...ceful-endgame/

Lots of lawyers (one of 80’s favorite professions) making a LOT of money off baseless fraud claims.

[FriscoDawg]

So for $3 million, Trump gained 45, but Biden gained 132. 87 votes difference (the opposite way of the goal for his team).

It's a grift I tell you. Those attorneys are printing money (and they know what's going to happen with these things).

Not what the Wisconsin recount was about. The 221K now challenged absentee ballots is what the recount was about. Just made fools of the LSM and their followers even more.

A bargain at less than $15 a ballot. Evidentiary discovery for that number of ballots would have cost much more than that without the help from Milwaukee and Dane counties.

Speaking of the LSM, James O'Keefe and Project Veritas just dropped a nuclear warhead on a short fuse straight into CNN's lap. No bias there .

[FriscoDawg]

Barr says DOJ hasn’t found any evidence of widespread fraud that would change the results of the election.

Barr must be on that Soros payroll.

DOJ isn't looking. At least not yet.

[Guisslapp]

Not what the Wisconsin recount was about. The 221K now challenged absentee ballots is what the recount was about. Just made fools of the LSM and their followers even more.

A bargain at less than $15 a ballot. Evidentiary discovery for that number of ballots would have cost much more than that without the help from Milwaukee and Dane counties.

You want to make a bet on the outcome of that lawsuit? They ain’t tossing the 221k absentee ballots.

[dawg80]

No, he didn’t.

Yes...he did.

[FriscoDawg]

Not suspicious at all that China directed $400M to Dominion Voting Systems. Yeah, right.

[dawg80]

The Dems picked states that 1) were battleground states (purple) and they knew the legit vote was gonna be close, and 2) states with willing accomplices of Dem SC, courts, election officials that would participate in the grand theft election. Then around 9 - 10 o'clock we saw "the pause" and the ballot dump was on, the fix was in. Today, in either Michigan or Wisconsin, eye witnesses testified openly what they saw, such as many thousands of ballots without proper signatures/verification carried in and "dumped."

Some idiots maintain that signed affidavits (under threat of perjury) and eye witnesses are not evidence. Right...when eyewitnesses see a crime committed they are automatically dismissed because it's not evidence. "Officer, I saw that guy right there, in the purple shirt and yellow hat grab that woman's purse, he then shoved her down to the ground..." Officer: sorry, that's not good enough.

[Guisslapp]

The Dems picked states that 1) were battleground states (purple) and they knew the legit vote was gonna be close, and 2) states with willing accomplices of Dem SC, courts, election officials that would participate in the grand theft election. Then around 9 - 10 o'clock we saw "the pause" and the ballot dump was on, the fix was in. Today, in either Michigan or Wisconsin, eye witnesses testified openly what they saw, such as many thousands of ballots without proper signatures/verification carried in and "dumped."

Some idiots maintain that signed affidavits (under threat of perjury) and eye witnesses are not evidence. Right...when eyewitnesses see a crime committed they are automatically dismissed because it's not evidence. "Officer, I saw that guy right there, in the purple shirt and yellow hat grab that woman's purse, he then shoved her down to the ground..." Officer: sorry, that's not good enough.

It is what the affidavits say that is the issue. They don’t allege facts that prove the case.

[Guisslapp]

Not suspicious at all that China directed $400M to Dominion Voting Systems. Yeah, right.

Not true. You read garbage,

[johnnylightnin]

Yes...he did.

You’re extra wrong even for you.

[JuBru]

Not suspicious at all that China directed $400M to Dominion Voting Systems. Yeah, right.

Stop visiting websites of questionable content.

UBS Securities LLC is not the same as UBS Securities Co. Ltd.

The LLC bought into the Staple Street Capital's fund. The Co. Ltd. is not associated with it.

Also:
Joint Statement from Elections Infrastructure Government Coordinating Council & the Election Infrastructure Sector Coordinating Executive Committees

https://www.cisa.gov/news/2020/11/12...uncil-election

[inudesu]

It is what the affidavits say that is the issue. They don’t allege facts that prove the case.

Exactly.

If you sign an affidavit that you saw someone punched in the face, that sounds serious. But then when we all find out it was at a boxing match, we move on.