No, Michigan.Originally Posted by FriscoDog
|
|
|
|
|
No, Michigan.
It’s the anti- law/constitution Dems that need the deep soul searching. It’s not over yet folks.
Published 25 mins ago
Giuliani presses Trump election challenge case in fiery news conference with legal team
Rudy Giuliani aggressively made the case for the Trump campaign's legal challenges
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/giu...ews-conference
Poor ole Rudy was sweating under the lights, looked like make-up running down his cheek. But like a true American hero, he soldiered on.
This needs to go to court, in front of the US Supreme Court and all those thousands of witnesses, many of them Democrats who actually care about our country, can testify.
Not over by a long stretch. Nor should it be. And the commie media doesn’t legally declarer a winner just to stir the liberal masses into a “you say there’s a chance” frenzy; especially when and if they lose.
Much-less, stopping all vote counting in America at midnight, the night of the election, just to see how many phony Biden ballots they need to beat Trump who was winning in all of the critical states.
Watch Live: Trump Campaign Holds Press Conference to Outline ‘Viable Path to Victory’
https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2...th-to-victory/
The only fraud is Rudy's hair color.
Time is your friend. Impulse is your enemy. -John Bogle
Yep!
Top Pollster Finds 47% Say ‘Likely’ Democrats Stole Election
https://www.breitbart.com/2020-elect...tole-election/
This is the real problem.
Because while some (many) have taken the stand of "what can it hurt, let the lawsuits run their course, if Biden won, he won, let's just verify" and I don't disagree with that logic (I mean, that's the law, right, you can challenge what you can challenge, knock yourself out), the issue is people who WILL NOT ever recognize the results because they've been conditioned not to.
It won't matter how many recounts happen, how many Republicans attest to a fair election, how many suits are lost. Trump said he could not lose, so his base doesn't believe he can lose. Sadly for them, they'll keep giving him money to waste on this stuff. Sadly for us (meaning all of us), we can't get a transition going. It's only good for those angling for tv/book deals or running for Senate in Georgia. Or counting up billable hours for a lost cause. Or selling ads for breitbart/fox/msnbc/cnn/etc.
Rudy says he has the evidence, as any two-bit lawyer will tell you, you can't try a case in the arena of public opinion, you have to go to a court of law, preferably with a conservative judge who will actually APPLY the law, not try to make it. Thousands of people have already stepped up, signed affidavits, said they would testify under oath to what they saw, what they know. So, not being a two-bit lawyer...like others we all know and love...Rudy refused to disclose any more. This evidence needs to be properly presented in court.
Now...do I KNOW if Rudy really has such evidence? No. But, there should at least be some kind of hearing, such that a non-biased panel, maybe 3 to 5 judges, can review it behind closed doors and offer an opinion if the case is worthy to proceed. That makes sense, I think.
Getting pretty late to bring it now...and those affidavits. Lol, those cases are getting tossed out because they don’t prove anything.
What are they, like 0-24 so far? Something like that?
On the other hand, if this is true, then we're not exactly talking about a good faith effort here.
1-28 was the last I saw. Not sure what the win was. No question, this is not a good faith effort. Not sure anybody ever thought a Trump loss would be.
Even Tucker had to call out Sydney Powell’s BS...you know it must be pretty bad
About those affidavits claiming an overvote...turns out they mixed up Minnesota counties/towns for Michigan counties/towns.
https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.usa...amp/6362056002
Well here you go. Game on!
Published 55 mins ago
McEnany: Trump's path to victory is Supreme Court, exposing 'systemic' voter fraud
Campaign adviser claimed to have evidence, but none has been presented in court
Game has been over for awhile now. A few of you just haven’t figured it out yet.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote