The beat goes on...and is intentionally being ignored by the LSM.
MI Judge Orders Democrat Sec of State To Release All Communications With Dominion, Facebook, Apple, Amazon and Google
‘Double Standards’ of Democrats: They ‘Objected to More States in 2017 than Republicans Did Last Week’
https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2...did-last-week/
Biden didn’t permit debate on any of the objections (unlike this year, where you have a 2 hour debate every time a state is objected to).
But the biggest difference, though, is that Hillary conceded, and there was no effort in 2016/2107 to convince the public by Clinton/Obama/Biden that Congress had the power not to certify.
Oh brother🙄😒
Spinning wheel got to go round
https://www.americanthinker.com/blog...statement.html
Dominion ain't playing.Originally Posted by Thomas Lifson
Time is your friend. Impulse is your enemy. -John Bogle
Seth Rich is (er, was) one of you! I don't give a rat's ass about him. I do love the lame cover-up attempt though. We are suppose to believe someone shot in the back from about 20 feet was the victim of "failed robbery attempt." LOL! Of course, it was such a failure they didn't even rob him!
As for Dominion all they did was provide the platform, the means, by which a "grand theft election" could take place. In many ways they are probably like gun manufacturers, their product was used in a criminal activity, for which they (probably) had no knowledge of or direct participation in. Although, the fact they left a "door open" tells me they are complicit.
Try reading all three volumes of the Navarro Report. The multiple levels of fraud are laid out point by point.
Navarro Report
I'm not reading through 3 volumes of rehashing the stuff you guys have already posted on this thread that have been debunked. This is a dated article, but the summary of Volume 1 is:
I mean, they were talking Hatch Act after he released this stuff. At some point, if all the arguments in Volume 1 are so clearly wrong, I'm not wasting any more time on your Volume 2 (or 3).Many of Navarro’s claims are either anecdotal or widely debunked: He pointed to Trump’s early election-night leads in several states later won by Biden (which was due to late counting of mail-in ballots, not fraud), a suspicious-looking surveillance tape from Atlanta (local Republican officials say it showed normal vote-counting), and alleged malfeasance in a Detroit counting center (a judge called the allegations “not credible”).
Navarro criticized courts for rejecting the legal arguments advanced by Trump and his allies, castigated media outlets for stating there is no evidence of widespread fraud, and called for investigations (Attorney General William Barr said his department is investigating irregularities and has found no evidence of election-reversing fraud).
If Volume 2 is just the same argument about "manner" of choosing electors, I'm past that. I'm convinced (you know, by the Trump appointed judge) that this is not a good argument. Is there anything in Navarro 1, 2, or 3 that you haven't already argued in this thread?
To some extent this suffers from the same thing that you'd think Rudy or the other lawyers would have dealt with by now:
1. Here's the proof. (it's not)
2. Well, here's the proof (it's not)
3. Ok, but here's the proof (it's not)
4. Really, this time we have the proof (it's not)
Eventually we stop humoring this. If you get all worked about that you've totally caught them, and you got your states mixed up - that's a credibility hit. If you pretend to be totally confident about a constitutional issue that gets tossed, that's another. If you show a video that just totally is going to prove it to the world, and then it turns out to be the way things are always done (remember the suspicious suitcases?), I'm going to question whether you have any idea what you're talking about. If those hits keep coming, it gets harder and harder to take you seriously. This guy and Rudy and the pillow inventor guy and the Kracken have really undermined any decent evidence they might have (conceivably) found.
There is a reason most of Trump's lawyers bailed on this stuff early. Or tried really hard not to be included when this trash made it to court. And now, did I see that the President doesn't want to pay Rudy? I may be wrong on that.
Wish it had been Mishkin too, but Stirewalt defended the inexplicable Arizona premature call narrative just as much if not more.
Chris Stirewalt gets shitcanned by Fox News…
It's odd that he was fired for being right (err, correct).
If you call it early and you're wrong that seems like it'd be worse.