What Trump Said To Incite the Riot

[dawg80]

No, Goosey, it is YOU that don't want to hear the truth.

Biden said of Trump that his use of EOs reflected what a dictator would do. That it is through negotiation and compromise working WITH the legislative branch that real governing occurs. I actually agree with that statement taken at face value. But...it's Biden who has already signed 37 EOs in just the first week.

For four years we had to endure your endless parade of lies, half-truths and relentless attacks on America and good Americans. You claimed to be a Libertarian at first...LOL! but even you couldn't maintain that level of BS...then you claimed to be a conservative, a capitalist, and you were only attacking Trump out of concern for the GOP. Same with lil johnny who made some of the same claims. Well...Trump is gone. And still all you two can do is continue to attack Trump and by your silence, defend and condone what Biden and his commie puppet masters are doing.

Just slap that hammer & sickle patch on your shoulder and wear it proudly!

[SicemDawgz]

Funny, that you keep changing the leftist narrative. I doubt the above will be what those idiot leftists and RINOs in congress go to in the fake trial.

That trial is dead on arrival and a huge waste of time and resources.

[dawg80]

BTW, as I am always concerned with being credible, Trump did issue a lot of EOs. He signed 220 in 4 years. That is more per a 4-year period than obummer, Bush II, Clinton, Bush I, and Reagan did. You have to go back to Carter who issued a whopping 320 EOs to find a POTUS with more. In Trump's case he had ZERO cooperation from a hostile Congress and he had his Constitutional duty to undo all the unconstitutional acts of obummer.

We shall see how many Biden ultimately issues. But with 37 in just his first week he is off and winging. Biden should have a mostly cooperative Congress for the next two years, and should be able to follow his own edict and use compromise to get his agenda through the legislative process.

[Guisslapp]

BTW, as I am always concerned with being credible, Trump did issue a lot of EOs. He signed 220 in 4 years. That is more per a 4-year period than obummer, Bush II, Clinton, Bush I, and Reagan did. You have to go back to Carter who issued a whopping 320 EOs to find a POTUS with more. In Trump's case he had ZERO cooperation from a hostile Congress and he had his Constitutional duty to undo all the unconstitutional acts of obummer.

We shall see how many Biden ultimately issues. But with 37 in just his first week he is off and winging. Biden should have a mostly cooperative Congress for the next two years, and should be able to follow his own edict and use compromise to get his agenda through the legislative process.

He has much to fix and fast after 4 years of destructive incompetence by Trump. However, if he wants any of this to ensure he will need to use the legislative process.

[Guisslapp]

Funny, that you keep changing the leftist narrative. I doubt the above will be what those idiot leftists and RINOs in congress go to in the fake trial.

It only seems like it is changing because you never read the articles of impeachment.

[FriscoDog]

He has much to fix and fast after 4 years of destructive incompetence by Trump. However, if he wants any of this to ensure he will need to use the legislative process.

He has both chambers of Congress.. why the need for EOs?


Remember when Biden said that he was going to stop all fracking during debates and stop keystone pipeline? When we brought it up, we were told "he did not say that".. "we were taking it out of context".. well I remember.. and Biden did it.

[SicemDawgz]

He has both chambers of Congress.. why the need for EOs?


Remember when Biden said that he was going to stop all fracking during debates and stop keystone pipeline? When we brought it up, we were told "he did not say that".. "we were taking it out of context".. well I remember.. and Biden did it.

Bob says context is everything, so I’m sure if you view this under the right lens it makes perfect sense.

[PawDawg]

It only seems like it is changing because you never read the articles of impeachment.

So I can put you on record as saying it wasn’t the Wednesday speech that incited the “overthrow attempt”

[Guisslapp]

He has both chambers of Congress.. why the need for EOs?


Remember when Biden said that he was going to stop all fracking during debates and stop keystone pipeline? When we brought it up, we were told "he did not say that".. "we were taking it out of context".. well I remember.. and Biden did it.

Speed. Legislation takes time.

[Guisslapp]

So I can put you on record as saying it wasn’t the Wednesday speech that incited the “overthrow attempt”

It played a part, but it is ignorant to view it in isolation.

[PawDawg]

It played a part, but it is ignorant to view it in isolation.

Tell that to your leftists idiot heros who are ONLY using the Wednesday speech narrative.

[Guisslapp]

Tell that to your leftists idiot heros who are ONLY using the Wednesday speech narrative.

It makes sense to focus on that part. That was particularly egregious given the timing, the message, and the atmosphere. You just hear what the right wing tells you. Read the articles of impeachment and some legit media.

Are you saying that people that were there for his speech didn’t breach the capitol?

[Guisslapp]

I know you guys like to point to the one time he said “peacefully” in his 70 minute speech, but you ignore all the heated rhetoric that dominated the speech. Hell, he said the word fight like 20 times. The message was about the country being stolen, invoking the idea that it would be morally justified to take urgent action now to stop it from happening. The crowd probably thought that if they showed up in mass with the president (he said he was coming with them) they wouldn’t encounter resistance. These poor folks suffer from extreme TDS.

[PawDawg]

It makes sense to focus on that part. That was particularly egregious given the timing, the message, and the atmosphere. You just hear what the right wing tells you. Read the articles of impeachment and some legit media.

Are you saying that people that were there for his speech didn’t breach the capitol?

The capital was being "breached" while he was still giving the speech. This narrative will eventually be proven wrong. That's why you leftists are now trying to use the last 4 years and previous 4 weeks as the reason...

[Guisslapp]

The capital was being "breached" while he was still giving the speech. This narrative will eventually be proven wrong. That's why you leftists are now trying to use the last 4 years and previous 4 weeks as the reason...

Capitol was breached at 2:15. His speech ended at 1:10, right?