I have seen reports that the WAC will vote on adding McNeese and UIW today.
The C-USA is doing the right thing by adding football powerhouses. Those three have solid programs and are committed to growth. Something the C-USA should have done with previous expansions when they added "markets" not
"programs"
However, UNLESS our ADMINISTRATION gets their act together and comes up with a solid long term plan for advancing the University AND Athletics, we will be dead in the water again in 10 years time.
This board has already offered multiple suggestions:
On the university side -On the athletic side -
- We need a student athletic fee.
- We need to grow our online degree offerings.
- We need to promote the university more through advertising in big markets.
- We need to offer in state tuition to neighboring states.
Seriously, most of this stuff is not rocket science, it is practical and pragmatic approaches to building an institution.
- Get rid of boy blunder's ridiculous tailgating policies.
- Tell Skippy it is time to change or be left behind. Average is no longer acceptable.
- Hire for conference championships in every sport.
- Continue to build out our facilities. Focus on all LTAC donors, not just the top 10%.
Sam Houston St will decline. They attempted to pass a student athletic fee in order to fund the move to FBS football and it failed.
Assuming WKU and MTSU leave and reports of adding LU, SHSU, JSU and NMST (football only) are correct:
Football (7)
-Tech
-UTEP
-FIU
-SHSU
-JSU
-LU
*NMSU
Basketball (6)
-Tech
-UTEP
-FIU
-SHSU
-JSU
-LU
Baseball (5)
-Tech
-FIU
-SHSU
-JSU
-LU
Judy, we still have a problem here.
How about the exit fees can only be used to update the media production equipment. So this way CUSA schools can produce the events. They could command more money this way when going to the table. Telling the networks all they would need to provide is announcers and a feed to desired channel.
Uconn, UMass and Army are still out there too. Plus whatever FCS teams that bring worth.
Going by rumors I've seen
NMSU all sports, UConn, UMass FB Only, UTA, UALR Olympic SPorts
Football (9)
-Tech
-UTEP
-FIU
-SHSU
-JSU
-LU
-NMSU
* UCONN
* UMass
Basketball (9)
-(2021 Net 71) Tech
-(143) UTEP
-(298) FIU
-(169) SHSU
-(291) JSU
-(85) LU
-(164) NMSU
-(242) UT-Arlington
-(221) UALR
Baseball (8)
-(2021 RPI 29) Tech
-(149) FIU
-(109) SHSU
-(137) JSU
-(35) LU
-(245) NMSU
-(141) UT-Arlington
- (172) UALR
I am not yet convinced the Exit Fees will be paid. I expect there will be significant legal efforts by the departing to avoid paying them to what will at best be the skeleton of a conference in tack.
I am not sure how this conference will survive.
Do the pros outweigh the cons of far-away independents joining c-usa (can't really be all caps C-USA anymore)?
Do the pros outweigh the cons of regional FCS schools moving to FBS/c-usa especially if they are succeeding at the FBS level?
Looking like c-usa will pretty much be starting over from scratch if able to at all. What gives the best upside for the conference... being stretched out from New Mexico to Massachusetts or going with southern FCS schools hoping they will strengthen?
I thought there were athletic program requirements for schools to be FBS. Are those requirements staying in place? It can't be a simple or inexpensive step for a school to move from FCS to FBS. I don't really understand how c-usa can pull programs from the FCS level like it is an easy answer to the problem.
I thought NMSU was football only (makes no sense…hope I’m wrong)
Jason Groves
@JPGroves
·
1h
NMSU Regents meeting on Friday. agenda item: Consideration of proposal for conference move