:? Any one hear what the announced attendance was ?
How about some stats, especially Moats
:? Any one hear what the announced attendance was ?
How about some stats, especially Moats
Moats ended up with 100yards on the nose. So that's 5 consecutive gamesof 100 yards, and over 1000 yards on the year.
SMU had a surprisingly decent run defense....everything else....well...
Moats- 16 carries for 100 yards & a score.
LA Tech- 192 rushing yards, 209 passing yards.
The Dawgs whipped some butt today.
Attendance- 14,872
Originally Posted by DogsWin
Your kidding right??
Reddawg
Boo on the Ruston community and the ones who rather go hunting than watch Tech play.
There were several of us that drove in from out of state and from south La.
Ditto! Good seeing you!Originally Posted by DONW
Where did the attendance stat come from? If that's true, I'm guessing a lot of people that traveled 4 hours south to the LSU game opted out of this one.Originally Posted by DogsWin
Season ticket sales + tickets sold on game day + a few hundred. Just my opinion. The sad part is that there were many many empty seats held by season ticket holders. As usual, most embarassing are the blue chairbacks being empty.
I couldn't believe all the empty blue chairbacks. There's a waiting list for these seats. If these people aren't going to use them, they should give them up to someone who will. It looks really bad with so many of them being empty.
Say what you want, but Oaks has no one other than himself to blame for this. It is simple that Bicknell creates no excitement for Tech and has even turned many long time supporters against Tech (or at least not coming to the game). I can account for 9 season tickets that had no one in them, because no one wants to watch a team that got smacked the week before and Bicknell has pissed off the entire town with his dumb comments. No one has confidence in him, as long as he is our coach attendence is going to suffer. Oakes and Reneau can only blame themself for allowing Bicknell to stay. Even if Bicknell turns out to be a good coach, it is clear he is not the person for Tech right now.Originally Posted by maddawg
I'm thinking either I was way too 'happy' or the scorekeeper missed a carry by Ryan at the end of the game; He was taken out and then Wilson did a nice job. But then I could have sworn it was Moats who came in for a sweep to the right for 12 yards. When he stepped out of bounds, #75( Harris)was standing on the sidelines and he took a cheap shot at him. He gave him the shoulder, but the running back kept his feet.Originally Posted by DogsWin
Am I crazy or was that Moats??? Is there a way to make sure? :?:
No matter who the RB was, #75 should have received a personal foul!! :x
I'm thinking either I was way too 'happy' or the scorekeeper missed a carry by Ryan at the end of the game; He was taken out and then Wilson did a nice job. But then I could have sworn it was Moats who came in for a sweep to the right for 12 yards. When he stepped out of bounds, #75( Harris)was standing on the sidelines and he took a cheap shot at him. He gave him the shoulder, but the running back kept his feet.Originally Posted by altadawg
Am I crazy or was that Moats??? Is there a way to make sure? :?:
No matter who the RB was, #75 should have received a personal foul!! :x[/quote:fc41bae63e]On radio, Nitz said that Moats had come back in for one more carry because it looked as if Danny Wilson was winded.
Martie
I'm thinking either I was way too 'happy' or the scorekeeper missed a carry by Ryan at the end of the game; He was taken out and then Wilson did a nice job. But then I could have sworn it was Moats who came in for a sweep to the right for 12 yards. When he stepped out of bounds, #75( Harris)was standing on the sidelines and he took a cheap shot at him. He gave him the shoulder, but the running back kept his feet.Originally Posted by BamaDawg
Am I crazy or was that Moats??? Is there a way to make sure? :?:
No matter who the RB was, #75 should have received a personal foul!! :x[/quote:68bb8109f0]On radio, Nitz said that Moats had come back in for one more carry because it looked as if Danny Wilson was winded.
Martie[/quote:68bb8109f0]
Well, who can fix this then??? Moats had 18 carries for 112 yards I believe. Can someone emial a TECH official??
Media Relations office. It can be changed, they just have to submit it to the WAC office and then to the NCAA office. Not a big deal, BUT it has to be done...not just going to FIX ITSELF...lol. Know what I mean?