View Poll Results: How do you rate the 2001 Recruiting Class?

Voters
36. You may not vote on this poll

  • A

    0 0%

  • B

    10 27.78%

  • C

    15 41.67%

  • D

    9 25.00%

  • F

    2 5.56%
+ Reply to Thread
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 16 to 19 of 19

Thread: 2001 Recruiting Class

  1. 12-12-2004, 01:48 PM #16
    Bigdog13
    Bigdog13 is offline
    Champ Bigdog13 has a reputation beyond reputeBigdog13 has a reputation beyond reputeBigdog13 has a reputation beyond reputeBigdog13 has a reputation beyond reputeBigdog13 has a reputation beyond reputeBigdog13 has a reputation beyond reputeBigdog13 has a reputation beyond reputeBigdog13 has a reputation beyond reputeBigdog13 has a reputation beyond reputeBigdog13 has a reputation beyond reputeBigdog13 has a reputation beyond repute Bigdog13's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    Keller, Texas
    Posts
    16,450

    Re: 2001 Recruiting Class

    Quote Originally Posted by dawg80
    Well, IMO, the 2001 recruiting class is a LOT more talented and gifted than showed on the field. Those guys NEVER had a prayer to develop into good(or great) college players because of horrible coaching.

    I guarantee if Dan Hawkins had been Tech's coach since 2001, NONE of you would be questioning the talent level at Tech.
    Can't argue with that.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  2. 12-12-2004, 03:10 PM #17
    Dirtydawg
    Dirtydawg is offline
    Champ Dirtydawg has a reputation beyond reputeDirtydawg has a reputation beyond reputeDirtydawg has a reputation beyond reputeDirtydawg has a reputation beyond reputeDirtydawg has a reputation beyond reputeDirtydawg has a reputation beyond reputeDirtydawg has a reputation beyond reputeDirtydawg has a reputation beyond reputeDirtydawg has a reputation beyond reputeDirtydawg has a reputation beyond reputeDirtydawg has a reputation beyond repute Dirtydawg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Ruston
    Posts
    17,159

    Re: 2001 Recruiting Class

    In my opinion, no wide receiver in the past 3 years deserves better than a C.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  3. 12-12-2004, 03:21 PM #18
    rphdawg
    rphdawg is offline
    Champ rphdawg is a jewel in the roughrphdawg is a jewel in the roughrphdawg is a jewel in the roughrphdawg is a jewel in the roughrphdawg is a jewel in the roughrphdawg is a jewel in the roughrphdawg is a jewel in the roughrphdawg is a jewel in the roughrphdawg is a jewel in the roughrphdawg is a jewel in the roughrphdawg is a jewel in the rough rphdawg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Field Supervisor
    Posts
    2,425
    Send a message via AIM to rphdawg Send a message via Yahoo to rphdawg

    Re: 2001 Recruiting Class

    Quote Originally Posted by Dirtydawg
    In my opinion, no wide receiver in the past 3 years deserves better than a C.
    AND WE STILL HAVE THE SAME WR COACH.....go figure....
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  4. 12-12-2004, 08:52 PM #19
    Dawgbitten
    Dawgbitten is offline
    Champ Dawgbitten is a jewel in the roughDawgbitten is a jewel in the roughDawgbitten is a jewel in the roughDawgbitten is a jewel in the roughDawgbitten is a jewel in the roughDawgbitten is a jewel in the roughDawgbitten is a jewel in the roughDawgbitten is a jewel in the roughDawgbitten is a jewel in the roughDawgbitten is a jewel in the roughDawgbitten is a jewel in the rough Dawgbitten's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Mandeville, LA
    Posts
    4,289

    Re: 2001 Recruiting Class

    D80, I had to give you some green on that post. True, true.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
+ Reply to Thread
« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts

Forum Rules