i share your disalusionment with politicians and their "reforms". but you must admit that this reform at least tries to address the issues of kids not learning what needs to be learned. most politicians, when they want to make a political show of supporting schools, just indescriminantly increase funding. some even do really rediculous things to show that they are pro-education; such as ronnie muskgrove (former governor of mississippi) when he decided to put the state's already struggling budget into even more of a bind by putting the internet in every classroom. he was so proud that mississippi was the first state to have the internet in every classroom. as an educator, do you think that is the best use of funds for educating young people? el dorado's math and english "chair" positions also come to mind. these are just ways for politicians to pay a political friend the salary of three or four teachers while looking very pro-education to the voters (whose money they are wasting).
it really does seem rediculous, though, to teach the standardized test. i need some evidence before i believe that is actually a no child left behind directive. i don't mean to doubt you, coach, but i really believe that sort of thing would have been brought up by the opposition before the bill was passed. instead, all they did was try to scare everybody about school choice.