+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 8 of 8

Thread: Lady Techster Recruiting Rankings 1987-2005

  1. #1
    Big Dog ACSlatech1994 is a name known to allACSlatech1994 is a name known to allACSlatech1994 is a name known to allACSlatech1994 is a name known to allACSlatech1994 is a name known to allACSlatech1994 is a name known to allACSlatech1994 is a name known to allACSlatech1994 is a name known to allACSlatech1994 is a name known to allACSlatech1994 is a name known to allACSlatech1994 is a name known to all
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Bunkie
    Posts
    578

    Lady Techster Recruiting Rankings 1987-2005

    To add to the discussion of the Lady Techsters ability to attract top talent now versus in the past. The following rankings were taken from All-Star Girls Report and Blue Star Ranking. I have tried to include some of the top recruits with their rankings to go along with each year.
    1987-1988 NR
    88-89 NR
    89-90 NR
    90-91 #2
    91-92 #8 (V. Johnson, D. Williams, R. Spurlock)
    92-93 #15 (P. Thomas, etc.)
    93-94 NR
    94-95 # 7 (A. Wilson, M. Maxwell, L. Stallworth)
    95-96 #13 (T. Jackson#9, D. Butler#30)
    96-97 NR (M. Bowman#77)
    97-98 #2 (T. Lewis#7, A. Walker#11, B. Lassiter#30)
    98-99 #8 (Ford#24, Frierson#76)
    99-00 NR
    00-01 NR (E. Smith#33)
    01-02 #11 (T. Crain#81, A. Boyd#80, T. Kursh)
    02-03 NR
    03-04 NR
    04-05 NR

  2. #2
    Champ faninmonroe has a reputation beyond reputefaninmonroe has a reputation beyond reputefaninmonroe has a reputation beyond reputefaninmonroe has a reputation beyond reputefaninmonroe has a reputation beyond reputefaninmonroe has a reputation beyond reputefaninmonroe has a reputation beyond reputefaninmonroe has a reputation beyond reputefaninmonroe has a reputation beyond reputefaninmonroe has a reputation beyond reputefaninmonroe has a reputation beyond repute faninmonroe's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Posts
    6,133

    Re: Lady Techster Recruiting Rankings 1987-2005

    good info - eye opening

  3. #3
    Administrator qng001 has a reputation beyond reputeqng001 has a reputation beyond reputeqng001 has a reputation beyond reputeqng001 has a reputation beyond reputeqng001 has a reputation beyond reputeqng001 has a reputation beyond reputeqng001 has a reputation beyond reputeqng001 has a reputation beyond reputeqng001 has a reputation beyond reputeqng001 has a reputation beyond reputeqng001 has a reputation beyond repute qng001's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Little Rock, AR
    Posts
    19,248

    Re: Lady Techster Recruiting Rankings 1987-2005

    I know christie sides transferred from miss to tech

  4. #4
    Champ champion110 has a reputation beyond reputechampion110 has a reputation beyond reputechampion110 has a reputation beyond reputechampion110 has a reputation beyond reputechampion110 has a reputation beyond reputechampion110 has a reputation beyond reputechampion110 has a reputation beyond reputechampion110 has a reputation beyond reputechampion110 has a reputation beyond reputechampion110 has a reputation beyond reputechampion110 has a reputation beyond repute
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    35,330

    Re: Lady Techster Recruiting Rankings 1987-2005

    Good information. I can certainly agree that we need to get some high ranking recruits in again.

  5. #5
    Champ LT is a jewel in the roughLT is a jewel in the roughLT is a jewel in the roughLT is a jewel in the roughLT is a jewel in the roughLT is a jewel in the roughLT is a jewel in the roughLT is a jewel in the roughLT is a jewel in the roughLT is a jewel in the roughLT is a jewel in the rough
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Posts
    1,469

    Re: Lady Techster Recruiting Rankings 1987-2005

    I suspect the 04-05 class will be much better than the 97-98 (#2) class. The 01-02 (#11) class was certainly better than the 97-98 class. I wonder who did these rankings.
    ________
    Fetish Beach
    Last edited by LT; 05-05-2011 at 12:16 AM.

  6. #6
    Champ LT is a jewel in the roughLT is a jewel in the roughLT is a jewel in the roughLT is a jewel in the roughLT is a jewel in the roughLT is a jewel in the roughLT is a jewel in the roughLT is a jewel in the roughLT is a jewel in the roughLT is a jewel in the roughLT is a jewel in the rough
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Posts
    1,469

    Re: Lady Techster Recruiting Rankings 1987-2005

    Thanks for the info., ACS.
    ________
    Uhwh warehouse
    Last edited by LT; 05-05-2011 at 12:16 AM.

  7. #7
    Champ beaux66 Ultimate jerk and not worth your timebeaux66 Ultimate jerk and not worth your timebeaux66 Ultimate jerk and not worth your timebeaux66 Ultimate jerk and not worth your timebeaux66 Ultimate jerk and not worth your timebeaux66 Ultimate jerk and not worth your timebeaux66 Ultimate jerk and not worth your timebeaux66 Ultimate jerk and not worth your timebeaux66 Ultimate jerk and not worth your time
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Posts
    1,866

    Re: Lady Techster Recruiting Rankings 1987-2005

    i thought i read that we were 18 this year

  8. #8
    Big Dog ACSlatech1994 is a name known to allACSlatech1994 is a name known to allACSlatech1994 is a name known to allACSlatech1994 is a name known to allACSlatech1994 is a name known to allACSlatech1994 is a name known to allACSlatech1994 is a name known to allACSlatech1994 is a name known to allACSlatech1994 is a name known to allACSlatech1994 is a name known to allACSlatech1994 is a name known to all
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Bunkie
    Posts
    578

    Re: Lady Techster Recruiting Rankings 1987-2005

    Our early signing class has us ranked 18th so far. The final ranking will take into consideration the entire class (spring signees, etc. ) and each recruit's senior season stats. Therefore, we could move up or down depending on who we sign and how our signees perform during senior season and summer all star camps etc.

+ Reply to Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts