I'm looking forward to us posting a big W just like we did against Fresno last season after the Rainbows realize we've got the pot o' Gold.
________
FULL MELT HASH
I'm looking forward to us posting a big W just like we did against Fresno last season after the Rainbows realize we've got the pot o' Gold.
________
FULL MELT HASH
Last edited by MADDAWGNBAMA; 02-16-2011 at 03:36 PM.
Going back to the title of the thread, here's a theory - Lovett vs. Hines.
Although I don't know why I'm laughing.Originally Posted by glm47
I thought everybody WANTED the weaker scheduling?Originally Posted by Tech XXIX
Kansas is definitely an improvement over scheduling Auburn. I would include Miami in that same breath, but I would be willing to play anybody--whether it is USC, Miami, Michigan, etc.--if they will do the 2 for 1 deal.
Oh man , I agree. I really , really wanted to tone down the schedule. But I would play any BCS school 2 for 1. Thats a no brainer.Originally Posted by mikedog
what kinda 2 for 1 deal are ya'll talking about? And the scheduling HAS been fine, with the exception of last year. Not very many if any other schools would go thru that stretch that we did last year... 4 top 20 teams, back to back, only one at home. That's way too tough.
2 for 1 as in we play 2 games at Miami they play 1 here. Or OSU is another example.Originally Posted by DocMarvin362
I disagree about the scheduling being fine prior to this last year. Last year was just the straw that broke the camels back.
We must have the worst luck in college football as far as scheduling goes. We always seem to catch teams on their way up, i.e. LSU and Auburn. Now I'm concerned about Kansas, they gave Oklahoma all they wanted and should have won that game.Originally Posted by mikedog