"Thank goodness C Ben Wilkerson scored a 25 because the average of the other 2 Tiggers would have been an 11." Well, if they would have thrown out the other two scores then it would have been a 25! What a valid argument. You can if, and, or but it to death if you want, of course, that's just like a Tech fan, wanting to throw out certain statistics or add certain ones that don't even exist (Spears DID NOT take the test) in order to validate the argument.Originally Posted by TYLERTECHSAS
Where am I trying to rationalize the scores? They are what they are. The only point I was trying to make was that overall, the Tech scores aren't any better, end of story. I could really care less why they are so low, there isn't much I can do about it that's for sure.
I never said the Tech scores were left out of the thread, I just said you left them off of your list. No big deal, it just sounded a little like the pot calling the kettle black. I guess I misunderstood you, please accept my most humble apology.
Oh, and to answer your question that you've asked twice, no one asked me. Did someone ask you? I didn't realize you had to be asked something in order to post on this board. What's the point of that question anyway?