Invasion of the body snatchers! One of our resident libtards has been hijacked.
|
|
|
|
|
Invasion of the body snatchers! One of our resident libtards has been hijacked.
Oh **** off.Originally Posted by dawg80
You think CNN would do this to Obama and Hillary?
CNN SPY CAM ON OVAL OFFICE...
MIKA FREAKING...
'We are all really nervous'...
Well of course Hillary's and her people did as they are above the law and media bias and harassment.
Hillary's team met with Russian ambassador, says Kremlin...
Sergey Kislyak, the Russian ambassador to Washington CREDIT: AFP
13 MARCH 2017 • 12:53AM
- Harriet Alexander, new york
Hillary Clinton’s team members met with the Russian ambassador during the election as well as Donald Trump’s, the Kremlin spokesman has alleged, as he set out to dismiss the “hysteria” surrounding Mr Trump’s links to Russia.
The house intelligence committee will hold its first session on Russia on March 20, with the heads of the FBI, national security agency and CIA expected to appear, plus previous intelligence chiefs.
But Dmitry Peskov, the press secretary for Vladimir Putin, said on Sunday that America was “self-humiliating” in insisting that Russia hacked its election.
Liberals should be proud that they are part of a party that is actually encouraging terrorism in our own country.
Talk about spying!! Where's the media??
NOT NICE: RICE 'UNMASKED'
'KNOW NOTHING'
The media......crickets......it doesn't fit their Obozo/Hillary loving agenda!!!
This guy is such a worthless tool at this point in his life.
The liberal left and media should being screaming the exact verbiage of what's happening. But no they are too PC and don't want to offend the religion that beheads for a pastime. Where is NOW or Hillary and all of the pink pussy hat wearers?
BIAS ALERT
New York Times scraps 'female genital mutilation' for being 'culturally loaded' term
By Cody Derespina
Published April 24, 2017 Fox News
A top New York Times editor decided the paper shouldn’t use the term “female genital mutilation” because the phrase is too “culturally loaded” and widens a divide between the Western world and “people who follow the rite.”
Health and Science editor Celia Dugger said she came to the conclusion to refer to the act of removing the female genitalia of young girls as “genital cutting” during a trip to Africa in the 1990s. She spoke about her decision in a Times mailbag article in response to a reader’s question.
“I never minced words in describing exactly what form of cutting was involved, and there are many gradations of severity, and the terrible damage it did, and stayed away from the euphemistic circumcision, but chose to use the less culturally loaded term, genital cutting,” Dugger wrote. “There’s a gulf between the Western (and some African) advocates who campaign against the practice and the people who follow the rite, and I felt the language used widened that chasm.”
The term “female genital mutilation” has actually been used by the Times in six articles in 2017, according to a website search; however, the instances are extremely restricted. For instance, two of the mentions occur in the context of a quoted speech or statement, two were in opinion columns, one in a book review and one in the mailbag explanation of why the Times didn’t use the term. The abbreviation “FGM” appeared this year only in stories taken from wire services such as The Associated Press and Reuters.
The Daily Caller was one of the first organizations to draw attention to the Times’ practice; however, groups as ideologically opposite as the United Nations Population Fund have also written about the potential danger in referring to genital mutilation as “cutting.”
MORE
http://www.foxnews.com/us/2017/04/24/new-york-times-scraps-female-genital-mutilation-for-being-culturally-loaded-term.html
We all knew this would happen.
'TROUBLED BY THAT'
Obama’s $400G Wall St. payday stuns liberal base- Former President Obama's upcoming speech to Wall Streeters is putting $400,000 in his pocket - and putting longtime supporters in a difficult situation.
Democratic Party leaders and grass roots activists alike are at a loss to explain how the onetime champion of the 99 percent could cash in with a September address at a health care conference run by investment firm Cantor Fitzgerald.
“Spiritual leader of the people’s #Resistance cashes in with $400k speech to Wall Street bankers,” read one tweet.“Obama’s $400,000 Wall Street speech will cost @TheDemocrats much more than that," read another. "It reinforces everything progressives hate about Democrats.”"[Money] is a snake that slithers through Washington.”- Sen. Elizabeth Warren, D-Mass.
MORE
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2017...e-stunned.html
Ah...of course they would have done this with Obama as President and his hundreds of scandals.
BLOODSPORT: WASH POST NEWSROOM CHEERS AFTER LATEST HIT ON PRESIDENT...
WASH POST newsroom in ecstasy from Obama visit...
ACE REPORTER MYSTIFIED BY FBI REFUSAL TO LOOK AT EMAIL-HACK EVIDENCE
Even more bizarre following bombshell revelation on murdered DNC staffer
Published: 18 hours agoimage: http://www.wnd.com/files/2013/03/gkant_avatar.jpg
GARTH KANT
Sharyl Attkisson
WASHINGTON – On the heels of a bombshell revelation that indicated it might have been a Democratic staffer rather than the Russians who hacked the party’s emails, a top investigative reporter is even more puzzled by the FBI’s curious lack of curiosity in perhaps the prime piece of evidence.
Five-time Emmy-award winning reporter Sharyl Attkisson shared her razor-sharp insights with WND on a truly bizarre aspect of the investigation: If the Democratic National Committee, or DNC, claimed its email system was hacked by Russia, why didn’t it let the FBI examine its email server?
And why didn’t the FBI examine the server regardless of whether the DNC objected?
“This has always been befuddling to me,” Attkisson mused.
Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2017/05/ace-repor...2hST9T6Z746.99
the real question is whether you are troubled by it.we all knew this would happen.
'troubled by that'
obama’s $400g wall st. Payday stuns liberal base- former president obama's upcoming speech to wall streeters is putting $400,000 in his pocket - and putting longtime supporters in a difficult situation.
democratic party leaders and grass roots activists alike are at a loss to explain how the onetime champion of the 99 percent could cash in with a september address at a health care conference run by investment firm cantor fitzgerald.
“spiritual leader of the people’s #resistance cashes in with $400k speech to wall street bankers,” read one tweet.“obama’s $400,000 wall street speech will cost @thedemocrats much more than that," read another. "it reinforces everything progressives hate about democrats.”"[money] is a snake that slithers through washington.”- sen. Elizabeth warren, d-mass.
more
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2017...e-stunned.html
"All roads lead to Putin" -- Thomas Jefferson
Me personally, I don't care.. I don't begrudge a man making a living and if people want to pay him for speaking, doesn't matter to me. If BHO or Clinton made 600K a speech good for them. What I hate is the hypocrisy. They both as democrats denounced the 1%. Publically bashed Wall St. and to a certain degree "capitalism"... remember "you didn't build that"? As with many in DC.. rules are for the "little people".. they don't apply to us...
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
