Originally Posted by
Dirtydawg
That's interesting, TT. I didn't realize the Iraqi's voted on whether or not for us to be there. Don't get me wrong, I'm not against the war in Iraq. In fact, I'm of the opinion that we need to be playing by Al Qaeda's rules instead of the Geneva convention rules. If we did that, this would be over with by summer. Be that as it may, I'm always suspect of polls like the first article references in which it asks people if they would prefer one situation over the next. In this case, I look at is asking them if they would rather be pissed on or spit on. Well, neither is desired, but one is more acceptable. Before I read your response about the Iraqi's voting, I already had formed an idea. This was my idea. Figure out a way to get the people of Iraq to the polls. Let them vote to decide if we should stay or leave. From what I understand, it's the Dems who think the Iraqi's want us out and the Repubs who think they want us there, and that by leaving now we will be leaving them in the lurch. I'm of the opinion that there are Iraqis on both sides of the issue just as in any country. That's why both sides are finding stories about Iraqis wanting us to leave as well as those wanting us to stay. Well, why not let the Iraqi people vote. If the majority want us out, we pull out and don't have to worry about the consequences. The Iraqi people can't blame us when all hell breaks loose once we're gone because they will have been the ones to have sent us away instead of us leaving them hanging out on a rope.