Fine! just as long as we boot those out of the country who are found to be "unworthy" of staying here.Originally Posted by Guisslapp
|
|
|
|
|
Fine! just as long as we boot those out of the country who are found to be "unworthy" of staying here.
That is the idea.
Looks like they are counting actual Americans in those stats.
MSNBC finds it appropriate to "make fun" of the White House Easter celebration.
Oh brother.
The same one that has been going on thru many administrations, both Dem and Repub?
Anyway, my gang had a blast. My son just sent a pic of President Trump holding his youngest daughter, my granddaughter. Also have a great pic of the whole family with the First Lady.
Why are the libs so concerned about the citizenship question on the 2020 Census? Illegals are law-breakers, many (most) commit an array of crimes, so...don't you think they will just lie on the Census too?
My name is Jose...I snuck across the border...Si! I am a citizen.
Reuters: SCOTUS is poised to give Trump a victory on census regarding status question.
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-u...-idUSKCN1RZ0X9
quote:
The U.S. Supreme Court’s conservative majority on Tuesday appeared inclined to hand President Donald Trump a victory on his administration’s plan to add a citizenship question to the 2020 census, a move opponents call a Republican effort to deter immigrants from taking part.quote:
Lower courts have blocked the question, ruling that the administration violated federal law and the U.S. Constitution in seeking to include it on the census form. A ruling by the Supreme Court is due by the end of June. Opponents have said inclusion of a citizenship question would cause a sizeable undercount by frightening immigrant households and Latinos from filling out the census forms, fearful that the information would be shared with law enforcement. This would cost Democratic-leaning areas electoral representation in Congress and federal aid, benefiting Trump’s fellow Republicans and Republican-leaning parts of the country, they said.quote:
During extended arguments that lasted about 80 minutes, Roberts and other conservative justices appeared to embrace the administration’s argument that the question would yield better data to enforce the Voting Rights Act, which protects eligible voters from discrimination. Roberts challenged New York Solicitor General Barbara Underwood, whose state sued the administration over the plan to add the question, saying citizenship is critical information for enforcing the Voting Rights Act. Roberts also said it is “quite common” for census questions to capture demographic information.quote:
Kavanaugh cited other countries that ask a citizenship question as part of their censuses. “It’s a very common question internationally,” Kavanaugh said. Gorsuch and fellow conservative Justice Samuel Alito both challenged evidence that asking about citizenship could cause census response rates to decline, as the challengers contend. Gorsuch noted that “it’s not like this question is improper to ask.”
People who are going to lie are going to lie. See Trump, Hillary, and BHO as prime examples. Why would legal immigrants have a problem answering truthfully? Oh, they mean illegals won’t participate. I thought that was the point. How silly of me.
Just means that states like Texas, California, Florida, Georgia and NY will get fewer House representatives than they would be entitled under the Constitution. Also fewer resources from the feds and others (including private businesses) that use census districts reporting to determine where people are.
Good!
I knew you didn’t support the Constitution.
I'm being lazy and don't feel like looking it up, where in the Constitution does it say illegals should be counted in the Census?
Article 1, section 2.
Again in Amendment 14, section 2
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
