Dems go racial

[JuBru]

It shouldn't. So, why would this jerk try to mislead people about his? Or, because he's a Republican, are other Republicans willing to excuse his obvious lack of integrity? (and yes, I realize it's basically a meaningless race, but it's indicative of a larger problem)

You are assuming his mislead the voters. The voters are completely culpable. It is a falsehood to say withholding information is the same as lying or misleading, especially if it is not important information like his race.

I don't think there is anything along the lines of Democrat vs Republican for this position. But I admit I don't much of anything about HCC.

[dawg80]

Mav:

You're just mad that a conservative used the race card and won with it. I know, that's been reserved for you libtards up to now.

Everything's fair in love, war and politics!

[dhussdawg]

It shouldn't. So, why would this jerk try to mislead people about his? Or, because he's a Republican, are other Republicans willing to excuse his obvious lack of integrity? (and yes, I realize it's basically a meaningless race, but it's indicative of a larger problem)

Couldnt agree more. It is very indicative of the larger problem of people not knowing who or what they are voting for....

[Guisslapp]

If they voted on the basis of racial prejudice, they got what they deserved.

[TYLERTECHSAS]

Shocking.

http://www.khou.com/news/local/White...231222981.html

[maverick]

You are assuming his mislead the voters. The voters are completely culpable. It is a falsehood to say withholding information is the same as lying or misleading, especially if it is not important information like his race.

I don't think there is anything along the lines of Democrat vs Republican for this position. But I admit I don't much of anything about HCC.

I didn't say the voters were misled. I asked why this jerk would try to mislead voters. I'm sure some will, but it's hard to argue that wasn't his motivation.

[maverick]

Mav:

You're just mad that a conservative used the race card and won with it. I know, that's been reserved for you libtards up to now.

Everything's fair in love, war and politics!

Libtard? I assume "lib" is derived from liberal; can you elaborate on the rest of the word?

Curious: how many "libtards" do you know who voted for Reagan, GHWB, GWB, and Romney?

[dawg80]

BS! you're a libtard in sheep's clothing.

Anyone can post I voted for.....but your posts give you away.

[Ktulu7]

Those folks in Houston got what they deserved. I personally don't think universal suffrage works now anyway, since the majority of people seem to be ignorant and lazy. I wish there were some sort of way of testing or something, or some criteria that could be used to at least ensure that not a huge mass of frickin' morons could vote. This ignorant mass is why we are happily whistling and skipping on our way down the path to communism.

[maverick]

BS! you're a libtard in sheep's clothing.

Anyone can post I voted for.....but your posts give you away.

A logical person might ask himself why I would be honest on liberal matters and dishonest on conservative ones.
A logical person might ask himself why I would hold socially liberal views but try to fool anonymous internet posters that I voted for conservatives.
A logical person might ask himself whether it's possible for a person to not walk in lock-step with only one political party.
A logical person...wait, I think I see the flaw in your "logic."

I certainly have no reason to try to mislead you, or anyone else, about my views. And you certainly have no reason to question the veracity of my statements. I doubt we agree on much, but I wouldn't stoop to calling you a liar, particularly when I don't even know you.

[Woof!]

Libtard? I assume "lib" is derived from liberal; can you elaborate on the rest of the word?

Probably a word meant to demean mentally challenged people and alienate them and their families from the GOP.

[T1]

Libtard = Tea bagger

Kids will be kids, right Mr. President?

[maverick]

Libtard = Tea bagger

Kids will be kids, right Mr. President?

All of those names are childish and demeaning. I wonder about adults who can't have ideological differences without silly name calling.

[T1]

All of those names are childish and demeaning. I wonder about adults who can't have ideological differences with silly name calling.

We elect them president.... twice!

Our current president HATES half the country. It can't be proven, but I believe he sent the IRS after them. Ruthless, ruthless man.

[maverick]

We elect them president.... twice!

Our current president HATES half the country. It can't be proven, but I believe he sent the IRS after them. Ruthless, ruthless man.

*I meant "without" name calling, of course. I get your point, but I was talking about adults on a message board, not presidents. I've given up on holding presidents to the "adult" standard.