'
I don't buy that explanation one bit. I see a vast difference between segregation and what the court just said. Segregation is saying "you can't go to this school because your white" or "you can't go to this school because your black" or "Hispanic/Latino" or "Asian" or whatever- basically that "this school is only for this race, now go away"... Are you saying that we are to change what we have learned and what has been taught about what segregation is/was because somebody's master plan (intentional wording) got thrown off???
How is saying that schools can not use race as a determining factor for anything the same as segregation??? This is giving EQUAL access to everyone, regardless of race... If I'm not mistaken, is that not what Brown v. BE intended and such?
And the another issue - should schools be state or federally controlled? OR privately? (I personally say privately - can be better, because it really can't get any worse)