1-119 or whatever.
Sportsline used to do it but I can't find it on the website anymore.
1-119 or whatever.
Sportsline used to do it but I can't find it on the website anymore.
CFN does complete rankings. They are, in my opinion, the most balanced and complete college football coverage on the interweb.
Accept no subsitutes.
http://cfn.scout.com/2/675514.html
Sprotsline still does them as well. Click on CFB, then Polls. It shows their 3 top-25s, below the Sportsline top 25 there is a link for 26-120. They have us at 109.
I wonder why CFN has 119 and Sportsline has 120.
SI also has them, with pretty pictures. We are the lowest ranked team that actually won their opening game. 100ish.
I am surprised Boise and Hawaii are so low in the CFN rankings. The both had big blowout games against inferior opponents just like most of the top 25 had. Wonder what the difference is? :icon_wink:
(post #666 - feeling a little devilish today)
I will probably do my computer poll again. I can post it here if you like. although I don't start until after 3 games had been played because there just isn't any data after just 2.
105. UL Monroe (0-1)
106. Florida Atlantic (1-0)
107. Middle Tennessee (0-1)
108. Louisiana Tech (1-0)
109. Temple (0-1)
110. Idaho (0-1)
111. UAB (0-1)
112. UL Lafayette (0-1)
113. Eastern Michigan (0-1)
114. Buffalo (0-1)
115. Utah State (0-1)
116. Army (0-1)
117. Rice (0-1)
118. North Texas (0-1)
119. FIU (0-1)
We are the lowest ranked 1 win team and behind the Chickenhawks according to CFN.
Jordan Mills on choosing Tech:
“It’s a great experience seeing them play. It was a good atmosphere. The fans stood up the whole game and never sat down. They have a great fan base.”
101Arkansas State1010100L 21 - 13
TexasSep. 08
Memphis100--
102Ball State990101L 14 - 13
Miami (Ohio)Sep. 08
@Eastern Michigan87--
103Memphis1000100L 23 - 21
MississippiSep. 08
@Arkansas State78--
104UAB1040100L 55 - 18
Michigan StateSep. 08
@Florida State81--
105Tulane1050000-
Sep. 08
Mississippi State110--
106San Diego State1070000-
Sep. 08
@Washington State82--
107Army1080100L 22 - 14
AkronSep. 08
Rhode Island33--
108Louisiana Tech1091000W 28 - 7
Central ArkansasSep. 08
Hawaii14--
109Rice870100L 16 - 14
Nicholls StateSep. 08
@Baylor61--
110Louisiana-Monroe1100100L 35 - 17
TulsaSep. 08
@Clemson102--
111Middle Tennessee1110101L 27 - 14
Florida AtlanticSep. 06
@Louisville70--
112Duke1120100L 45 - 14
ConnecticutSep. 08
@Virginia57--
113Idaho1130100L 38 - 10
Southern CaliforniaSep. 08
Cal Poly127--
114North Texas1140100L 79 - 10
OklahomaSep. 08
@Southern Methodist54--
115Eastern Michigan1150100L 27 - 3
PittsburghSep. 08
Ball State66--
116Temple1160100L 30 - 19
NavySep. 08
Buffalo27--
117Buffalo1170100L 38 - 3
RutgersSep. 08
@Temple6--
118Utah State1180100L 23 - 16
UNLVSep. 08
@Wyoming123--
119Florida International1190100L 59 - 0
Penn StateSep. 08
Maryland38--
120Western Kentucky1200100L 49 - 3
FloridaSep. 08
West Virginia Tech128--
Good thing for FIU that cbs is including wku already.
I guess we'll just have to disagree. The guys at CFN are more gracious to non-BCS clubs than any other sportswriters out there.
Remember ... their rankings are not meant to be a prediction of how well team will finish, but on how good they appear right now.
So the question is ... are there 40 other teams who could have dismantled Weber State 56-7? Yeah, probably. Boise State, while dominant, really didnt show us that much.
I agree that 41 is probably a little low for the Broncos, but not unreasonable. Certainly not a deal breaker for the whole list, imho.
Last edited by Champ967; 09-05-2007 at 03:13 PM.