Originally Posted by
fanfromafar
So by your standards, Long and the Techsters have failed. Two years in a row. So if the Techsters should "get nothing" then shouldn't Long get the same? Nothing? Not another chance to deliver another dismal FAILING season?
The WNIT would at LEAST keep Tech's name out there while keeping SOME (even if very little) attention on us, AND it would give all of these YOUNG and INEXPERIENCED players more EXPERIENCE.
Isn't that what supposedly hurt us this year? A lack of experience?
If we're about returning to the elite (even top 100 at this point would be an improvement) then we need experience.
But then again, this is not a valid discussion, because it's doubtful the Techsters will receive an invitation. They finished tied for fourth place in the WAC, one of the weaker (est) conferences.
At least we're on the same page with something: I agree. Long has failed. He should get nothing.