Why Must Democrats Tell Lie?

[techman05]

She didn’t get any benefits.

So it’s a lie that she was listed as a person of color by Harvard? She didn’t get any special recognition that may result in privilege or position?

[Guisslapp]

So it’s a lie that she was listed as a person of color by Harvard? She didn’t get any special recognition that may result in privilege or position?

She didn’t get anything. Now, Harvard may have tried to make themselves look more diverse after the fact, but the Boston Globe article goes through all the facts and it was not considered for any position she ever had - not even a factor.

[Guisslapp]

Here is one...

You know, my mom and dad were born and raised out in Oklahoma, and my daddy was in his teens when he fell in love with my mother. She was a beautiful girl who played the piano. And he was head over heels in love with her and wanted to marry her. And his family was bitterly opposed to that because she was part Native American.

And eventually my parents eloped and they survived the Great Depression, they survived the Dust Bowl. They went through a lot of hard times. They raised three boys, my older brothers all of whom went off to the military. They raised me.

They knocked around and it was tough but they hung together. They hung together for 63 years. I know who I am because of what my mother and my father told me, what my grandmother and my grandfather told me, what all my aunts and uncles told me and my brothers.

It's a part of who I am and no one's ever going to take that away.

So which part is the lie? Are you saying her daddy’s family didn’t disapprove of her mom because she was part Native American? If so, what is your evidence?

[PawDawg]

So which part is the lie? Are you saying her daddy’s family didn’t disapprove of her mom because she was part Native American? If so, what is your evidence?

Read the story. The part about her mom being Indian (feather) is a lie. The recent DNA test proves that.

There are many other quotes pointing to her lies that are much more difficut to locate than they were 3 days ago. Imagine that!

[TYLERTECHSAS]

Quote?

You look it up Mr. Lazy. She's stated this many times and just did again.

"As a kid, I never asked my mom for documentation when she talked about our Native American heritage. What kid would? But I knew my father's family didn't like that she was part Cherokee and part Delaware, so my parents had to elope," she said, reiterating that she hadn't gotten any benefits because of her heritage.

[Guisslapp]

Read the story. The part about her mom being Indian (feather) is a lie. The recent DNA test proves that.

There are many other quotes pointing to her lies that are much more difficut to locate than they were 3 days ago. Imagine that!

I read the story quoted - perhaps you missed the “part” before “Native American” in the story you posted.

[PawDawg]

I read the story quoted - perhaps you missed the “part” before “Native American” in the story you posted.

He mom was no more native american than she is. The story was a lie.

[Guisslapp]

He mom was no more native american than she is. The story was a lie.

That is actually not true. If the Native American DNA came from her mom’s line she would necessarily have more NA dna than her daughter. And, again the story said the mom was part Native American (not full), and the real point was that her parental grandparents weren’t accepting of the mom because they were bigots and so her parents eloped.

[PawDawg]

That is actually not true. If the Native American DNA came from her mom’s line she would necessarily have more NA dna than her daughter. And, again the story said the mom was part Native American (not full), and the real point was that her parental grandparents weren’t accepting of the mom because they were bigots and so her parents eloped.

Okay

[PawDawg]

How can you explain this away? No way the socialists media can remove everything she lied about in the past...

https://legalinsurrection.com/2012/0...-ethnic-fraud/

[Guisslapp]

How can you explain this away? No way the socialists media can remove everything she lied about in the past...

https://legalinsurrection.com/2012/0...-ethnic-fraud/

I don’t see how that is relevant to the discussion. The Boston Globe story isn’t about whether she actually has Native American ancestry (that is what the DNA proves); it was debunking the right wing conspiracy theory that she benefitted from claiming such minority status. You should read the story rather than how the right wing tries to distort it.

[PawDawg]

Amazing. Even CNN is laughing at her lies and you are still defending her.

[Guisslapp]

Amazing. Even CNN is laughing at her lies and you are still defending her.

What lie?


Pretty sure people are laughing at her for letting Trump suck her into a pointless debate about her heritage.

[PawDawg]

What lie?


Pretty sure people are laughing at her for letting Trump suck her into a pointless debate about her heritage.

The DNA proved that she IS NOT an indian. Spin it if you will, but you are wrong on this.

[Guisslapp]

The DNA proved that she IS NOT an indian. Spin it if you will, but you are wrong on this.

She never claimed to be Indian. That is the right wing strawman version of what she said.