I thought I could contribute to society and make this the thread for all things WAC tourney related. Here is the bracket posted by the WAC.
http://www.wacsports.com//pdf4/38555...B_OEM_ID=10100
GO TECHSTERS!!!
I thought I could contribute to society and make this the thread for all things WAC tourney related. Here is the bracket posted by the WAC.
http://www.wacsports.com//pdf4/38555...B_OEM_ID=10100
GO TECHSTERS!!!
You gotta love how Idaho and Fresno are on the same side of the bracket.
Can somebody please tell me how LA Tech ended up with the #2 seed, instead of #1? I thought our recent victory over Fresno St --on their home floor-- would have given us the tiebreaker advantage. How were the top two seeds ultimately determined?
HD
I think because they beat the no 3 nevada twice, where we beat them once.
Im thinking anyway... wasnt that how it worked... anyway... its supposed to be in tiebreaker, go to conf w-l next behind the tie breaker (dont know about those below if their tied) and whoever has best w-l against that team continuing down the line.
It'll make more sense after we win the tourney...
Okay. Did a quick assessment, for fun.
Here's the team's we might play in the second round. I figure games within two days would assess fatigue and practice so here's the results with their Wins-Losses in games played on or before a second day after the prior game:
(As in if they play on the 1st, games included are the 2nd and 3rd ... not 4th)
Louisiana Tech 5-4 The losses are: 1 vs LSU, 2 vs Boise St, and 1 vs Viriginia.
U Nevada Reno 4-5 W includes home win over currrent #7 Louisville, and loss vs. Cal.
Boise State 6-5 2 of the W's are against us.
Hopefully this info is helpful to someone!
We need to put NMSU away early so our starters can play limited minutes.
Apparently the WAC does things backwards..
They determined the #3/#4 seed tiebreaker BEFORE they determined the #1/#2 seed tiebreaker.
That's why we ended up #2 instead of #1.
If you do the #1/#2 tiebreaker first, then Tech is the #1 seed....
And that is why the WAC......is......well.....WACK!!!!!