I have no issues with the free market of media.
I have issues with the US President using one specific company as his personal news outlet. That is wrong.
|
|
|
|
|
I have no issues with the free market of media.
I have issues with the US President using one specific company as his personal news outlet. That is wrong.
And as far as any "fairness" goes..hell no we DON'T need government involvement in the media.
Speaking of fairness and the media, which of course leads us to the DEM/LIB purposed "Fairness Doctrine"; does this sound familar? Yes, this is where Obama and the LIBS/DEMS want to take us. Afterall he's big buds with Chavez and his kind.
link
Venezuela: 'Freedom of expression must be limited'...
Originally Posted by TYLERTECHSAS
Wasn't there a thread a while back about certain congressional members wanting certain freedoms of expression to be considered hate crimes? Or was I having a nightmare?
Yes there was and it was the usual left wing anti- Constitution nutt jobs in both House and Senate.
And now this!Between this and the Obama ADM's attack on Fox News I see Obama's equivalent of TAAS in our future very soon.
Top White House Official Says Obama Team 'Controlled' Media Coverage During Campaign
White House Communications Director Anita Dunn is seen in a video from January talking about how the Obama campaign exercised absolute "control" over media coverage.
White House Communications Director Anita Dunn, in a remarkable admission last January, brags how the Obama campaign controlled the press with a strategy of making the media cover only what they wanted
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2009...rage-campaign/
__________________
Last edited by TYLERTECHSAS; 10-19-2009 at 04:22 PM.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote