Terrorism in America

[TYLERTECHSAS]

Also taught vacation bible school in Kingsville in 2014.

Is this you Guislapp?

Some Reactions to TX Shooting Revealed 'Elite Hostility to People of Faith'

http://insider.foxnews.com/2017/11/0...y-people-faith

[Guisslapp]

Is this you Guislapp?

Some Reactions to TX Shooting Revealed 'Elite Hostility to People of Faith'

http://insider.foxnews.com/2017/11/0...y-people-faith

No, but I do find it interesting that Trump removed one of the mental health restrictions on the background checks. I thought we all agreed mentally ill people should not be allowed to acquire guns. And, yes, I know in this case it was our esteemed military that dropped the ball on reporting the criminal conviction.

[TYLERTECHSAS]

Is this you Guislapp?

Some Reactions to TX Shooting Revealed 'Elite Hostility to People of Faith'

http://insider.foxnews.com/2017/11/0...y-people-faith

No, but I do find it interesting that Trump removed one of the mental health restrictions on the background checks. I thought we all agreed mentally ill people should not be allowed to acquire guns. And, yes, I know in this case it was our esteemed military that dropped the ball on reporting the criminal conviction.

Sorry but this nd mentally ill sick shooter " had purchased a total of four guns during the past four years, officials said.". This is during mentally challenged Obama's term as President. And yes it appears the Air Force might have screwed up. We shall see.

[Guisslapp]

Sorry but this nd mentally ill sick shooter " had purchased a total of four guns during the past four years, officials said.". This is during mentally challenged Obama's term as President. And yes it appears the Air Force might have screwed up. We shall see.

Do you support Trump rolling back one of the mental health restrictions?

[TYLERTECHSAS]

Do you support Trump rolling back one of the mental health restrictions?

Which one? And did he actually "roll it back"?

Again this declared atheist, and evil shooter bought his guns over the last 4 years during Obama's reign.

[Guisslapp]

Which one? And did he actually "roll it back"?

Again this declared atheist, and evil shooter bought his guns over the last 4 years during Obama's reign.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.nbc...mental-n727221

Back in February.

[TYLERTECHSAS]

Sorry but this mentally ill sick shooter " had purchased a total of four guns during the past four years, officials said.". This is during mentally challenged Obama's term as President. And yes it appears the Air Force might have screwed up. We shall see.

Do you support Trump rolling back one of the mental health restrictions?

Which one? And did he actually "roll it back"?

Again this declared atheist, and evil shooter bought his guns over the last 4 years during Obama's reign.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.nbc...mental-n727221

Back in February.

Again I say, this declared atheist, and evil shooter " had purchased a total of four guns during the past four years, officials said.". This was during Obama's reign of terror.

[Guisslapp]

Again I say, this declared atheist, and evil shooter " had purchased a total of four guns during the past four years, officials said.". This was during Obama's reign of terror.

You didn’t answer my question, and I already said that Trump’s reversal of Obama’s rule has nothing to do with this mass murder. Why can’t you answer the question that was asked?

[TYLERTECHSAS]

Sorry but this nd mentally ill sick shooter " had purchased a total of four guns during the past four years, officials said.". This is during mentally challenged Obama's term as President. And yes it appears the Air Force might have screwed up. We shall see.

Do you support Trump rolling back one of the mental health restrictions?

Which one? And did he actually "roll it back"?

Again this declared atheist, and evil shooter bought his guns over the last 4 years during Obama's reign.

You didn’t answer my question, and I already said that Trump’s reversal of Obama’s rule has nothing to do with this mass murder. Why can’t you answer the question that was asked?

If there isn't another mentally ill mass murderer then yes. How's that? But unfortunately there will be. This story and "roll back" isn't finished yet. It will be changed soon IMHO.

• 'Creepy' Texas church shooter 'preached atheism'

[Guisslapp]

If there isn't another mentally ill mass murderer then yes. How's that? But unfortunately there will be. This story and "roll back" isn't finished yet. It will be changed soon IMHO.

• 'Creepy' Texas church shooter 'preached atheism'

Just trying to figure out if you agree that mentally ill people should be barred from getting guns. And, if you agree with this basic premise, how you feel about Trump removing one of the protections against it.

[TYLERTECHSAS]

Do you support Trump rolling back one of the mental health restrictions?

Which one? And did he actually "roll it back"?

Again this declared atheist, and evil shooter bought his guns over the last 4 years during Obama's reign.

If there isn't another mentally ill mass murderer then yes. How's that? But unfortunately there will be. This story and "roll back" isn't finished yet. It will be changed soon IMHO.

• 'Creepy' Texas church shooter 'preached atheism'

Just trying to figure out if you agree that mentally ill people should be barred from getting guns. And, if you agree with this basic premise, how you feel about Trump removing one of the protections against it.

I think I just answered that question above. "Good chat son."

[atobulldog]

No, but I do find it interesting that Trump removed one of the mental health restrictions on the background checks. I thought we all agreed mentally ill people should not be allowed to acquire guns. And, yes, I know in this case it was our esteemed military that dropped the ball on reporting the criminal conviction.

Just trying to figure out if you agree that mentally ill people should be barred from getting guns. And, if you agree with this basic premise, how you feel about Trump removing one of the protections against it.

My understanding of the Obama regulation was that it took away 2A rights for people that "who have been deemed mentally incapable of managing their financial affairs" in regards to Social Security. "The NRA and the American Civil Liberties Union also opposed Obama's rule — the NRA for its restrictions on the Second Amendment, the ACLU for the possibility it would stereotype the mentally ill as violent."

It seems, and the ACLU agreed that the regulation was heavy handed and unfairly stereotyped a group of people. The "roll back" removes the power to restrict constitutional rights from a bureaucrat and leaves it to a judicial system where it can be properly adjudicated.

https://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-...ill-gun-buyers

[TYLERTECHSAS]

My understanding of the Obama regulation was that it took away 2A rights for people that "who have been deemed mentally incapable of managing their financial affairs" in regards to Social Security. "The NRA and the American Civil Liberties Union also opposed Obama's rule — the NRA for its restrictions on the Second Amendment, the ACLU for the possibility it would stereotype the mentally ill as violent."

It seems, and the ACLU agreed that the regulation was heavy handed and unfairly stereotyped a group of people. The "roll back" removes the power to restrict constitutional rights from a bureaucrat and leaves it to a judicial system where it can be properly adjudicated.

https://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-...ill-gun-buyers

Thanks atobulldog!

And there you have it Guislapp. Just more spinning BS news, by the left you are reading, trying to create more crappola on Trump.

[DawgyNWindow]

My understanding of the Obama regulation was that it took away 2A rights for people that "who have been deemed mentally incapable of managing their financial affairs" in regards to Social Security. "The NRA and the American Civil Liberties Union also opposed Obama's rule — the NRA for its restrictions on the Second Amendment, the ACLU for the possibility it would stereotype the mentally ill as violent."

It seems, and the ACLU agreed that the regulation was heavy handed and unfairly stereotyped a group of people. The "roll back" removes the power to restrict constitutional rights from a bureaucrat and leaves it to a judicial system where it can be properly adjudicated.

https://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-...ill-gun-buyers

I thought they had to be receiving a Social Security disability payment ("a crazy check") and be incapable of managing their affairs. I didn't think this applied to the rank and file retiree collecting their EARNED Social Security payment from 30+ years of hard work and taxes.

Personally, I am in favor of this restriction for the crazy check folks, but I am not in favor of doing this via executive order. The president should not be able to deprive anyone of their constitutional rights (the right to bear arms) without going through congress and it passing a Supreme Court ruling.

Just saw this was a bill, so ignore the executive order comment. (edited again....was this an executive order by Obama after all?)

[DawgyNWindow]

Thanks atobulldog!

And there you have it Guislapp. Just more spinning BS news, by the left you are reading, trying to create more crappola on Trump.

The most concerning point of this is that they were using private, yet publicly held, medical records to determine who gets to keep their constitutional rights. Think about how this could turn out if we go to a single payer system where your medical records are easily accessible by the likes of Lois Lerner, John Gruber or some other government hack. The government is NOT a benign entity, and the bigger it is the less benign it will be.