Everyone has a right to their own opinion so he is mine: Bruce has been an integral part of the improvements with the Athletic Program at Tech and I believe he knows how to continue to improve. #1 is to build the end zone facility and it will not get done with State funds. The funds will have to come from us, the Alumni. I believe he has the vision and has shown that he's got the work ethic and experience. Don't forget he was AD at Iowa St. when they had 5 bowl appearances in 6 years. He has shown the ability to increase operating revenues - in a 5 year span their Athetic Department's revenues increased from +/- $19MM to +/- $30MM. He helped double their fundraising in '05. If our AD is to be successful he will have to raise money from us. It boils down to bringing in $$ and spending it wisely. I will go on record as saying I'll donate $1000 to the LTAC if they hire Bruce. Now the administration obviously knows more about Bruce than us, but I certainly don't want to regress to the Oats days for sure. That's my vote for what it's worth.
Don't forget the Iowa State Scheduling/Recruiting controversy.
http://www.iowastatedaily.com/articl...0-archive7.txt
He wasn't AD when the shit hit the fan but he was AD when all of this was going on.
None of this means he would be a bad AD here. It just warrants us to consider other options.
Last edited by DAIQUIRIDAWG; 02-09-2010 at 01:48 PM.
Whoever "red dotted" me for my "R" word usage, that wasn't me. Just thought you'd like to make sure your deserved thoughts got to the appropriate place.