Originally Posted by
dhussdawg
A large portion? I need names. If this portion does exist, they arent talking because they know they have been proven wrong. You cant argue about a guy who is the only star on his team leading them to a championship and one other final. This accomplisment puts him over the Celts big 3 (Garnett is the only one that you can argue about being better). I think you are talking out of your ass, quite frankly. I could see a few defensive minded people agreeing with you, but a large portion? If that were true, we would have seen some articles somewhere saying that Dirk is good, but not that good. I havent seen them, please provide.