+ Reply to Thread
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 16 to 18 of 18

Thread: Got Droid?

  1. #16
    Champ JuBru has a reputation beyond reputeJuBru has a reputation beyond reputeJuBru has a reputation beyond reputeJuBru has a reputation beyond reputeJuBru has a reputation beyond reputeJuBru has a reputation beyond reputeJuBru has a reputation beyond reputeJuBru has a reputation beyond reputeJuBru has a reputation beyond reputeJuBru has a reputation beyond reputeJuBru has a reputation beyond repute JuBru's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Boston
    Posts
    20,133

    Re: Got Droid?

    Quote Originally Posted by ITdrummer View Post
    Kodak has a smartphone? I'm assuming they are suing one of the smartphone companies for some proprietary camera technology.
    http://www.gomonews.com/kodaks-sue-e...s-to-backfire/

  2. #17
    Champ Dirtydawg has a reputation beyond reputeDirtydawg has a reputation beyond reputeDirtydawg has a reputation beyond reputeDirtydawg has a reputation beyond reputeDirtydawg has a reputation beyond reputeDirtydawg has a reputation beyond reputeDirtydawg has a reputation beyond reputeDirtydawg has a reputation beyond reputeDirtydawg has a reputation beyond reputeDirtydawg has a reputation beyond reputeDirtydawg has a reputation beyond repute Dirtydawg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Ruston
    Posts
    17,159

    Re: Got Droid?

    Quote Originally Posted by Guisslapp View Post
    Wow. Claims 1 and 15 of the '647 patent are really broad. Hard to believe they could withstand a validity challenge. I haven't pulled the case to see what valid claims were found to be infringed, however.
    I was going to ask you for your professional opinion on those claims as they both seemed too broad to me. Sort of like McDonalds patenting the hamburger patty.

    I guess what I'm getting at is isn't there more than one way to accomplish what Apple is suing for, and/or if another company is able to use some type of different technology and/or design the technology to perform in a different capacity to get the same results, that wouldn't be considered infringement would it?

  3. #18
    Dawg Adamant Argument Czar Guisslapp has a reputation beyond reputeGuisslapp has a reputation beyond reputeGuisslapp has a reputation beyond reputeGuisslapp has a reputation beyond reputeGuisslapp has a reputation beyond reputeGuisslapp has a reputation beyond reputeGuisslapp has a reputation beyond reputeGuisslapp has a reputation beyond reputeGuisslapp has a reputation beyond reputeGuisslapp has a reputation beyond reputeGuisslapp has a reputation beyond repute Guisslapp's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    In your mind and under your skin
    Posts
    29,875

    Re: Got Droid?

    Quote Originally Posted by Dirtydawg View Post
    I was going to ask you for your professional opinion on those claims as they both seemed too broad to me. Sort of like McDonalds patenting the hamburger patty.

    I guess what I'm getting at is isn't there more than one way to accomplish what Apple is suing for, and/or if another company is able to use some type of different technology and/or design the technology to perform in a different capacity to get the same results, that wouldn't be considered infringement would it?
    To avoid infringement, you cannot have/do all of the things stated in the claim or an equivalent thereof (to the extent doctrine of equivalents will apply). It is not enough to do things differently than Apple does in practice or than Apple described in the application. It must be different than what Apple defined in the claims. All it takes is omitting one feature or step (depending on whether the claim is directed to an apparatus or a method). I don't know how many ways there are to achieve something comparable to what Apple has claimed other than how they claimed it.

    As far as companies that are overreaching patent bullies go, however, I would put Kimberly-Clark near the top of the list. Also, IBM files more patents every year than Apple.
    Jordan Mills on choosing Tech:
    “It’s a great experience seeing them play. It was a good atmosphere. The fans stood up the whole game and never sat down. They have a great fan base.”

+ Reply to Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts