Not hardily!
TRUMP JUMPS TO +4
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/latest_polls/
POLLSTER: “THE DAM IS ABOUT TO BREAK” ON HILLARY
Voters abandoning establishment candidate in droves
Paul Joseph Watson - OCTOBER 31, 2016
According to former Jimmy Carter pollster Pat Caddell, Hillary Clinton is hemorrhaging support as a result of the FBI announcement and we could see a repeat of the 1980 election when anti-establishment candidate Ronald Reagan won in a landslide.
Caddell drew comparisons to the 1980 presidential race, which was close right up until the final days before the electorate abandoned Carter and rallied around the anti-establishment candidate, leading to Reagan taking victory in a landslide.Caddell noted that Carter’s entire campaign had been built around portraying Reagan as unqualified and “dangerous,” in a similar vein to how Clinton has demonized Trump.
Caddell explained that the polling between Reagan and Carter was close up until the final weekend when “the dam broke” and Reagan shot ahead by ten points.
MORE
http://www.infowars.com/pollster-the...ak-on-hillary/
Trump just might pull this one out!
COLORADO: TIED
MICHIGAN: TIED
NEW HAMPSHIRE: TIED
NEVADA: TIED
PENNSYLVANIA: TIED
Polls Show African-American Vote for Donald Trump is Double Mitt Romney’s Vote
http://www.breitbart.com/big-governm...rican-support/
COLORADO: TIED
MICHIGAN: TIED
NEW HAMPSHIRE: TIED
NEVADA: TIED
PENNSYLVANIA: TIED
^ Kool-Aid ^
The polls have tightened up. But, with the winner-take-all (EC votes) format, all Klinton has to do is carry the traditional 'crap states and win a few of the toss-up states. It doesn't matter if she wins 50.1% to 49.9%. Heck, the oh-so-popular obummer barely squeaked out wins in some states over Romney. In some 'crap strongholds, obummer won 52% to 48%. And those were held up as, "ya see? obummer has a mandate from the people!"
I will be surprised if Trump wins this thing. The deck is stacked against him. The 'craps have already been caught cheating in 4 states, and they will continue to do so. The 'craps will also "buy" votes, the dead will vote, multiple times, and the 'craps will get out the vote because they do have, to their credit, an organized ground game. Of course, it is easier for the 'craps to gather up voters and provide transportation to the polls since their constituents can be readily identified by the welfare/food stamp rolls and those people found sitting on their front porch.
Now, just one little, interesting caveat has emerged. Probably won't amount to anything, but a few of the EC, the actual voters, have said even if Klinton carries their state, they will NOT case a vote for her. They did not say they would vote for Trump instead. They could simply abstain or vote for a 3rd party candidate. I doubt very seriously if enough EC voters will have the courage to follow suit. But this does point to just how unpopular Klinton is.
If she wins, a Republican Congress, with proper leadership (yeah, right!) could thwart Klinton and render her term meaningless and totally inept. A strong Congress could govern the nation. This could happen because "the people" won't rally to Klinton's support and demand Congress cooperate with her. Yeah, the libtard media will try to drum up such a movement, but it won't take root because even those voting for her, can't stand her!
What a mess we find ourselves in.
Another reason our country is bankrupt! Dang "big government Dems!!
Govt Workers Outnumber Manufacturing by 9,977,000...
Well of course....
STUDY: Press coverage of Trump first month 88% 'hostile'...
And the FAKE NEWS continues on by ABC, CBS, NBC, CNN, New York Times, etc.!!
You knew the liberals/dems were all washed out with false promises on this issue.
Proof: $15 minimum wage kills middle-class jobs
Data shows California to lose at least 400,000 positions
image: http://www.wnd.com/files/2014/02/mcd...er-596x283.jpg
Over the past 30 years, minimum-wage increases have reduced employment, a new study shows, and now, based on past data, a new $15 statewide minimum wage will cost the Golden State at least 400,000 jobs.
Commissioned by the nonprofit Employment Policies Institute, the study by David Macpherson of Trinity University and William Even of Miami University measured the impact of minimum-wage increases in California from 1990 to the present.
The economists found that a 10 percent increase in the minimum wage would cause a nearly 5 percent reduction in employment in an industry where one-half of workers earn wages close to the minimum.
Nearly half of the observed job loss occurs in food-service and retail industries.
In an industry with an average share of lower-wage workers, their findings imply that each 10 percent increase in California’s minimum wage has reduced employment for affected employees by 2 percent.
Applying their data to the state’s upcoming $15 minimum wage, they estimate that by 2022, approximately 400,000 jobs will be lost as a consequence.
The economists point out their estimate is conservative, because it measures the impact of California’s state minimum wage but does not account for job loss in counties that had insufficient data.
Last year, California Democratic Gov. Jerry Brown signed a bill into law that incrementally raises the state’s minimum wage from $10 an hour to $15 by 2023, with subsequent rises pegged to inflation.
“Whether the real-time response of an economy will mitigate or exacerbate the effects of raising the minimum wage is an open question,” the executive summary states.
“What is not in dispute, based on this study, is that California’s rising minimum wage has depressed employment opportunities in the most heavily-impacted industries.
“The conclusions should give pause to states or localities interested in emulating California’s wage experiment.”
Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2017/12/proof-15-...M7MmPEjp6be.99