+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 14 of 14

Thread: Projected possible starters, since we have the Roster now?

  1. 09-30-2011, 02:11 PM #1
    BlindDog
    BlindDog is offline
    Champ BlindDog has much to be proud ofBlindDog has much to be proud ofBlindDog has much to be proud ofBlindDog has much to be proud ofBlindDog has much to be proud ofBlindDog has much to be proud ofBlindDog has much to be proud ofBlindDog has much to be proud ofBlindDog has much to be proud ofBlindDog has much to be proud ofBlindDog has much to be proud of
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Ft.Lauderdale, Fla.(Wilton Manor)
    Posts
    4,307

    Projected possible starters, since we have the Roster now?

    O.K. Techster Fans, anyone want to guess the possible starters for this years 2011-2012 Techsters?
    I don't know if it will happen but would love to see:
    5- Anderson, with Langston replacing her...
    4. Shantel, with Frazier replacing her...
    3. Young- With Felton, Hardison, Jalena replacing her...
    2. Jones- with Felton, Hardison, or Jalena replacing her...
    1. Jasmine- Hayes replacing her...
    Also, would not mind seeing Frazier playing the 3 spot with Young at the small forward with Shantel as a possibility!
    Bring on some WBB!
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  2. 09-30-2011, 03:43 PM #2
    champion110
    champion110 is offline
    Champ champion110 has a reputation beyond reputechampion110 has a reputation beyond reputechampion110 has a reputation beyond reputechampion110 has a reputation beyond reputechampion110 has a reputation beyond reputechampion110 has a reputation beyond reputechampion110 has a reputation beyond reputechampion110 has a reputation beyond reputechampion110 has a reputation beyond reputechampion110 has a reputation beyond reputechampion110 has a reputation beyond repute
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    35,330

    Re: Projected possible starters, since we have the Roster now?

    Quote Originally Posted by BlindDog View Post
    O.K. Techster Fans, anyone want to guess the possible starters for this years 2011-2012 Techsters?
    I don't know if it will happen but would love to see:
    5- Anderson, with Langston replacing her...
    4. Shantel, with Frazier replacing her...
    3. Young- With Felton, Hardison, Jalena replacing her...
    2. Jones- with Felton, Hardison, or Jalena replacing her...
    1. Jasmine- Hayes replacing her...
    Also, would not mind seeing Frazier playing the 3 spot with Young at the small forward with Shantel as a possibility!
    Bring on some WBB!
    I think Frazier might be good enough to be a starter right away, actually. I hope Anderson has really improved her game. If not, Langston might have to step up quick.

    1. Jasmine
    2. Jones
    3. Young/Frazier (I agree with your thoughts above on this).
    4. Frazier/Shantel
    5. Shantel/Anderson

    I think we will have different starters at different times this year depending on if we can go with a smaller line-up with some teams. Sometimes speed and quickness outmatch a big post. If Anderson has improved, though, I think she will start and Shantel will start at the 4.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  3. 09-30-2011, 03:55 PM #3
    BlindDog
    BlindDog is offline
    Champ BlindDog has much to be proud ofBlindDog has much to be proud ofBlindDog has much to be proud ofBlindDog has much to be proud ofBlindDog has much to be proud ofBlindDog has much to be proud ofBlindDog has much to be proud ofBlindDog has much to be proud ofBlindDog has much to be proud ofBlindDog has much to be proud ofBlindDog has much to be proud of
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Ft.Lauderdale, Fla.(Wilton Manor)
    Posts
    4,307

    Re: Projected possible starters, since we have the Roster now?

    Quote Originally Posted by champion110 View Post
    I think Frazier might be good enough to be a starter right away, actually. I hope Anderson has really improved her game. If not, Langston might have to step up quick.

    1. Jasmine
    2. Jones
    3. Young/Frazier (I agree with your thoughts above on this).
    4. Frazier/Shantel
    5. Shantel/Anderson

    I think we will have different starters at different times this year depending on if we can go with a smaller line-up with some teams. Sometimes speed and quickness outmatch a big post. If Anderson has improved, though, I think she will start and Shantel will start at the 4.
    ---
    well put Champ!
    Sure going to be nice going from a great Football season to MBB and WBB this year!
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  4. 09-30-2011, 04:52 PM #4
    champion110
    champion110 is offline
    Champ champion110 has a reputation beyond reputechampion110 has a reputation beyond reputechampion110 has a reputation beyond reputechampion110 has a reputation beyond reputechampion110 has a reputation beyond reputechampion110 has a reputation beyond reputechampion110 has a reputation beyond reputechampion110 has a reputation beyond reputechampion110 has a reputation beyond reputechampion110 has a reputation beyond reputechampion110 has a reputation beyond repute
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    35,330

    Re: Projected possible starters, since we have the Roster now?

    Quote Originally Posted by BlindDog View Post
    ---
    well put Champ!
    Sure going to be nice going from a great Football season to MBB and WBB this year!
    I think so too! The Dawgs are going to break the close loss bad juju tomorrow and we are going to finish WAC Champs in football. It will make for a great start to bball!
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  5. 10-06-2011, 02:31 PM #5
    BlindDog
    BlindDog is offline
    Champ BlindDog has much to be proud ofBlindDog has much to be proud ofBlindDog has much to be proud ofBlindDog has much to be proud ofBlindDog has much to be proud ofBlindDog has much to be proud ofBlindDog has much to be proud ofBlindDog has much to be proud ofBlindDog has much to be proud ofBlindDog has much to be proud ofBlindDog has much to be proud of
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Ft.Lauderdale, Fla.(Wilton Manor)
    Posts
    4,307

    Re: Projected possible starters, since we have the Roster now?

    Hope to find out which of the new comers can really
    play some WBB for the Techsters tonight at the welcome back dinner!
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  6. 10-06-2011, 02:35 PM #6
    BuzDawg73
    BuzDawg73 is offline
    Champ BuzDawg73 has a brilliant futureBuzDawg73 has a brilliant futureBuzDawg73 has a brilliant futureBuzDawg73 has a brilliant futureBuzDawg73 has a brilliant futureBuzDawg73 has a brilliant futureBuzDawg73 has a brilliant futureBuzDawg73 has a brilliant futureBuzDawg73 has a brilliant futureBuzDawg73 has a brilliant futureBuzDawg73 has a brilliant future BuzDawg73's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    WICHITA, KANSAS
    Posts
    3,037

    Re: Projected possible starters, since we have the Roster now?

    See if you can find out anything about the two ladies missing from the roster, Kassietta Brown and Kadee Malone.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  7. 10-11-2011, 02:38 AM #7
    ESPNGuy
    ESPNGuy is offline
    Big Dog ESPNGuy is on top of his/her gameESPNGuy is on top of his/her gameESPNGuy is on top of his/her gameESPNGuy is on top of his/her gameESPNGuy is on top of his/her gameESPNGuy is on top of his/her gameESPNGuy is on top of his/her gameESPNGuy is on top of his/her gameESPNGuy is on top of his/her gameESPNGuy is on top of his/her gameESPNGuy is on top of his/her game ESPNGuy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Seattle, WA
    Posts
    746

    Re: Projected possible starters, since we have the Roster now?

    Good projections everyone. I can't wait to get the season underway.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  8. 10-12-2011, 11:00 AM #8
    fanfromafar
    fanfromafar is offline
    Champ fanfromafar is a jewel in the roughfanfromafar is a jewel in the roughfanfromafar is a jewel in the roughfanfromafar is a jewel in the roughfanfromafar is a jewel in the roughfanfromafar is a jewel in the roughfanfromafar is a jewel in the roughfanfromafar is a jewel in the roughfanfromafar is a jewel in the roughfanfromafar is a jewel in the roughfanfromafar is a jewel in the rough
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Posts
    1,417

    Re: Projected possible starters, since we have the Roster now?

    Quote Originally Posted by ESPNGuy View Post
    Good projections everyone. I can't wait to get the season underway.
    Wow.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  9. 10-12-2011, 11:01 AM #9
    ITdrummer
    ITdrummer is offline
    Champ ITdrummer has a reputation beyond reputeITdrummer has a reputation beyond reputeITdrummer has a reputation beyond reputeITdrummer has a reputation beyond reputeITdrummer has a reputation beyond reputeITdrummer has a reputation beyond reputeITdrummer has a reputation beyond reputeITdrummer has a reputation beyond reputeITdrummer has a reputation beyond reputeITdrummer has a reputation beyond reputeITdrummer has a reputation beyond repute ITdrummer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Shreveport, LA
    Posts
    7,305

    Re: Projected possible starters, since we have the Roster now?

    Quote Originally Posted by fanfromafar View Post
    Wow.
    ?
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  10. 10-12-2011, 02:09 PM #10
    fanfromafar
    fanfromafar is offline
    Champ fanfromafar is a jewel in the roughfanfromafar is a jewel in the roughfanfromafar is a jewel in the roughfanfromafar is a jewel in the roughfanfromafar is a jewel in the roughfanfromafar is a jewel in the roughfanfromafar is a jewel in the roughfanfromafar is a jewel in the roughfanfromafar is a jewel in the roughfanfromafar is a jewel in the roughfanfromafar is a jewel in the rough
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Posts
    1,417

    Re: Projected possible starters, since we have the Roster now?

    Quote Originally Posted by ITdrummer View Post
    ?
    Always amazed at the endlessly perky and seemingly brown-nosed nature of the posts. One thing's for sure: he won't get red dots.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  11. 10-16-2011, 02:09 PM #11
    Dawg06
    Dawg06 is offline
    Champ Dawg06 has a reputation beyond reputeDawg06 has a reputation beyond reputeDawg06 has a reputation beyond reputeDawg06 has a reputation beyond reputeDawg06 has a reputation beyond reputeDawg06 has a reputation beyond reputeDawg06 has a reputation beyond reputeDawg06 has a reputation beyond reputeDawg06 has a reputation beyond reputeDawg06 has a reputation beyond reputeDawg06 has a reputation beyond repute Dawg06's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    26,823

    Re: Projected possible starters, since we have the Roster now?

    Jimmy Watson, The Shreveport Times: Women's college teams in full swing

    This article suggests the Lady Techsters' starting line-up will be:

    1. Jasmine Bendolph
    2. Whitney Jones
    3. Kiara Young
    4. Whitney Frazier
    5. Tavasha Anderson
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  12. 10-16-2011, 05:35 PM #12
    champion110
    champion110 is offline
    Champ champion110 has a reputation beyond reputechampion110 has a reputation beyond reputechampion110 has a reputation beyond reputechampion110 has a reputation beyond reputechampion110 has a reputation beyond reputechampion110 has a reputation beyond reputechampion110 has a reputation beyond reputechampion110 has a reputation beyond reputechampion110 has a reputation beyond reputechampion110 has a reputation beyond reputechampion110 has a reputation beyond repute
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    35,330

    Re: Projected possible starters, since we have the Roster now?

    Quote Originally Posted by Dawg06 View Post
    Jimmy Watson, The Shreveport Times: Women's college teams in full swing

    This article suggests the Lady Techsters' starting line-up will be:

    1. Jasmine Bendolph
    2. Whitney Jones
    3. Kiara Young
    4. Whitney Frazier
    5. Tavasha Anderson

    I think that was my guess...... although, I did have some alternates in there depending on how much Anderson has improved.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  13. 10-17-2011, 08:26 AM #13
    qng001
    qng001 is offline
    Administrator qng001 has a reputation beyond reputeqng001 has a reputation beyond reputeqng001 has a reputation beyond reputeqng001 has a reputation beyond reputeqng001 has a reputation beyond reputeqng001 has a reputation beyond reputeqng001 has a reputation beyond reputeqng001 has a reputation beyond reputeqng001 has a reputation beyond reputeqng001 has a reputation beyond reputeqng001 has a reputation beyond repute qng001's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Little Rock, AR
    Posts
    19,248
    Send a message via AIM to qng001

    Re: Projected possible starters, since we have the Roster now?

    Quote Originally Posted by Dawg06 View Post
    Jimmy Watson, The Shreveport Times: Women's college teams in full swing

    This article suggests the Lady Techsters' starting line-up will be:

    1. Jasmine Bendolph
    2. Whitney Jones
    3. Kiara Young
    4. Whitney Frazier
    5. Tavasha Anderson
    Whitney Frazier = Adrienne Johnson clone
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  14. 10-17-2011, 06:01 PM #14
    gramtech
    gramtech is offline
    Varsity Bulldog gramtech is a jewel in the roughgramtech is a jewel in the roughgramtech is a jewel in the roughgramtech is a jewel in the roughgramtech is a jewel in the roughgramtech is a jewel in the roughgramtech is a jewel in the roughgramtech is a jewel in the roughgramtech is a jewel in the roughgramtech is a jewel in the roughgramtech is a jewel in the rough
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    496

    Re: Projected possible starters, since we have the Roster now?

    I like the line up. However, I see Donaldson over Anderson to start, if just for her experience. I do see Anderson with more minutes this year. I wouldn't be surprised to see Langston with significant minutes as well.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
+ Reply to Thread
« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts

Forum Rules