he's not isolationist. he's mind-our-own-businessist.Originally Posted by DogtorEvil
|
|
|
|
|
he's not isolationist. he's mind-our-own-businessist.
his definition of what constitutes OUR business does not align with mine. Other than that though...
Originally Posted by champion110
I am less angry this morning and ready to get back up on the horse. That girl was a freak last night.
Originally Posted by champion110
In fact, I finally had to tell her to stop over the last weekend, because I was worn out and needed a break.
Isolationism = Noninterventionism+ Protectionism
Paul is only a noninterventionist. He is the opposite of a protectionist in that he supports free trade.
Jordan Mills on choosing Tech:
“It’s a great experience seeing them play. It was a good atmosphere. The fans stood up the whole game and never sat down. They have a great fan base.”
He would leave Israel out twisting in the wind, and that I can't vote for. Some things are worth taking care of.
Newt
Compared to what we got now, if Paul's the man in Nov., he's got my vote ..... if he runs 3rd party, you young guys .... good luck dealing with the socialism the rest of your lives.
if you keep voting for republicans like romney, we're going to be dealing with socialism one way or another. one party just gets us there faster than the other. with the deomcrats, we'll be bankrupt by the time my son is old enough to vote. with the repubs, it may take another election cycle or two.
I don't know anything about this dude's background or politics, but it would certainly be refreshing if some of these so-called "conservatives" would point some fingers and speak their mind like he does.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature...&v=bdob6QRLRJU
Would love to see a US congressman rip the libtards like Prince Nancy, Barney "what is that in your mouth?" Frank, Obummer, etc.. and just tell the truth like that. One thing about Europeans in general, and the Brits in particular, they don't shy away from speaking the truth. Of course here, a congressman would be impuned for violating decorum.
I'm leaning that way too. I think if these guys had to post resumes including their education and experience, Newt's resume would have more info in it than possibly all the other candidates put together including Obama. Really the only thing I see with him as a problem is he has luggage and the lib media will be sure to ride that into the ground and he may be behind in the polls most of the way because of that. No worries here though, because eventually Obama has to debate him and its going to be route every time. Newt will play with him like a yo yo. Obama is going to have to depend on answers he's been taught and hope that he can remember it all and with Newt it will be a knee jerk reaction, just like Carter/Reagan and Carter shows up with a knife to gun fight.....Newt has probably forgotten more about running a government than Obama knows....my two cents
Newt has so much baggage he need's a 18 wheeler to haul it all around. He is usually the smartest man in the room though.
He's even done some things recently that were of a liberal nature and that may hurt him with the conservative/tea party crowd which I consider myself to be. I think we need to choose the candidate with the best resume here though and I am willing to look past all that if he will come with a program and ideaology like the 1994 Contract with America. It's going to take thinking like that to right the ship. He is the only one in my opinion that has the background to pull this off.....
Would be an interesting election, here comes obammer and michelle:
I like Newt as well. He is our best shot and he is brilliant in the clutch. When he has to hit a home run with something, he will.
I agree. Newt.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
