U-La-La, the 1st Gay University

[champion110]

I know that in some cases, perhaps a majority - I don't know, very young children that later identify themselves as homosexual may as children exhibit strong preference for activities typically associated with the opposite sex. At the same time, other very young children can exhibit the same strong preference for activities typically associated with the opposite sex, but as adults they are unquestionably heterosexual. After countless studies it seems that there is no conclusive evidence or consensus regarding the origins of homosexuality.

So I return to my contention that regardless of its origin, homosexuality is not an intended role and serves no good purpose either for the individual that is homosexual or society. It is not a "condition" to be celebrated, embraced as normal, or advocated as an acceptable alternative lifestyle for whatever minority might choose it. It is not something to be flaunted, as it is distasteful for a huge majority and their perspective should be respected. But it also need not be feared or hated by that huge majority, particularly when their view is being respected by the homosexual community at large.

Gender orientation and Homosexuality are two completely different issues, although they do have some overlap.

As for the second statement, maybe we don't know the purpose. I don't know a purpose of being White, Black, or any differences in humans you can find. And, with overpopulation, even though we love having children and a family, I don't see a purpose in being Heterosexual either. Besides, being Gay doesn't stop you from having kids and a family now, anyway. It must have some purpose, since it has been around for as long as history records. The only difference now is that it is acceptable to acknowledge it and that promotes longer term relationships.