Step away from the ledge Sarah Palin is still dumb

[JuBru]

Obama didn't go to Yale. He graduated from Columbia and Harvard.

[T_Won]

24,000 of Palin's private emails reviewed by media elites. Nothing dumb found. Nothing even interesting found. This doesn't seem to fit the stereotype.

[JuBru]

I thought the emails about her son Trigg were pretty interesting and awesome.

[T_Won]

I thought the emails about her son Trigg were pretty interesting and awesome.

Me too. (Didn't the media try to tell us that Trigg was not her baby or something?)

[JuBru]

Me too. (Didn't the media try to tell us that Trigg was not her baby or something?)

Yes. They said Trigg is Bristol's son, and some libtards still say it.

[T_Won]

They truly hate her ... probably at the same intensity that they hate Bush. All she did was run for VP against the messiah and they felt threatened. Vicious, mean attacks.

[DawgyNWindow]

They truly hate her ... probably at the same intensity that they hate Bush. All she did was run for VP against the messiah and they felt threatened. Vicious, mean attacks.

Is it really any different than the way they went after Reagan, Bush or Quayle? Heck, the libs were sweet on McCain until he threatened their power, then they sought to destroy him.

Tolerance is just a word to them. They are facists. They will seek to destroy anything that stands in their way of being able to indoctrinate the weak minded (like a few on here....I think they know who they are).

The fact that the press is complicit in this is pretty frightening. And if you don't think that matters, consider how many (me included) were willing to throw Sarah Palin under the bus for her version of Paul Revere's ride, when she was, in fact, correct. And consider how many, once they found out they were the ones that really didn't know the history, still proclaim SHE is the stupid one. Ignorance is strength.

[T_Won]

This is a pretty good read about the e-mails that give you a much better idea of who Palin really is:

"The messages give a behind-the-scenes look at a politician who burst onto the national stage after serving as Wasilla mayor and less than two years as Alaska governor. They show a woman striving to balance work and home, fiercely protective of her family and highly sensitive to media coverage. She expressed a sometimes mothering side with aides but was quick to demand answers or accountability."

http://juneauempire.com/state/2011-0...-vp-nomination

[genpop]

Is it really any different than the way they went after Reagan, Bush or Quayle? Heck, the libs were sweet on McCain until he threatened their power, then they sought to destroy him.

Tolerance is just a word to them. They are facists. They will seek to destroy anything that stands in their way of being able to indoctrinate the weak minded (like a few on here....I think they know who they are).

The fact that the press is complicit in this is pretty frightening. And if you don't think that matters, consider how many (me included) were willing to throw Sarah Palin under the bus for her version of Paul Revere's ride, when she was, in fact, correct. And consider how many, once they found out they were the ones that really didn't know the history, still proclaim SHE is the stupid one. Ignorance is strength.

Omg this guy actually mentioned Dan Quayle..... Didn't a juvenile have to help him spell potato?

[T_Won]

Omg this guy actually mentioned Dan Quayle..... Didn't a juvenile have to help him spell potato?

His point is that you remember that! Is that really a big deal? You would think his law degree was given to him out of sympathy for his stupidity.

[genpop]

[quote=T_Won;1086410]His point is that you remember that! Is that really a big deal?

You would think his law degree was given to him out of sympathy for his stupidity.[/

quote]


Wouldn't have been any worse than Bush's degree because his daddy was head of the CIA.......

[saltydawg]

Obama didn't go to Yale. He graduated from Columbia and Harvard.

No wonder he is so dumb. If only he had gone to LA Tech.

[oledawg66]

The Wikipedia War of Paul Revere and Sarah Palin

By The Atlantic Wire
Jun 6 2011, 3:46 PM ET 1

Sarah Palin will not relent in defending her revisionist history of Paul Revere's ride from Boston to Lexington, in which Revere "warned the British." And her supporters similarly will not relent in revising the history of the event on Wikipedia in order to reflect Palin's version. Wikipedia editors are fed up with the flood of poorly sourced changes to the Paul Revere page -- many point to Palin herself as a history expert -- and have called for a lock on the page and an end to the discussion.
Charles Johnson reported the volley of Palin-inspired changes to Paul Revere page and Dave Weigel offers a quick snapshot of the controversy. Here's a quick summary. Last week, Palin claimed that Revere warned the British not to take Americans' arms by "riding his horse through town to send those warning shots and bells." In questioning Palin's understanding of the Revere's midnight ride -- an event historians have undeniably studied in depth, leading to ample academic debate over the specifics -- critics point out that Revere definitely warned the colonists and probably did not do so by firing guns. This likely would've spoiled the clandestine nature of the mission.


Now that is really scary - that so many people would defend Palin's remarks even though she is clearly out in left field.


Thank goodness 60% of Republicans are not ready to turn the White House over to her:

Republican voters might prefer an ill-prepared, historically challenged, constitutionally and politically ignorant former governor as their candidate and might even believe she has the qualifications to be president, but they are not prepared to trust the next election to her.

[genpop]

Is it really any different than the way they went after Reagan, Bush or Quayle? Heck, the libs were sweet on McCain until he threatened their power, then they sought to destroy him.

Tolerance is just a word to them. They are facists. They will seek to destroy anything that stands in their way of being able to indoctrinate the weak minded (like a few on here....I think they know who they are).

The fact that the press is complicit in this is pretty frightening. And if you don't think that matters, consider how many (me included) were willing to throw Sarah Palin under the bus for her version of Paul Revere's ride, when she was, in fact, correct. And consider how many, once they found out they were the ones that really didn't know the history, still proclaim SHE is the stupid one. Ignorance is strength.

Dude stop being a sheep. The woman was W R O N G!!!!!

Palin was only trying to regurgitate facts that she had learned only days before. It is very conceivable that she didn't know ANYTHING about Revere before her trip.

http://www.deathandtaxesmag.com/1026...splaced-facts/

[genpop]

The Wikipedia War of Paul Revere and Sarah Palin

By The Atlantic Wire
Jun 6 2011, 3:46 PM ET 1

Sarah Palin will not relent in defending her revisionist history of Paul Revere's ride from Boston to Lexington, in which Revere "warned the British." And her supporters similarly will not relent in revising the history of the event on Wikipedia in order to reflect Palin's version. Wikipedia editors are fed up with the flood of poorly sourced changes to the Paul Revere page -- many point to Palin herself as a history expert -- and have called for a lock on the page and an end to the discussion.
Charles Johnson reported the volley of Palin-inspired changes to Paul Revere page and Dave Weigel offers a quick snapshot of the controversy. Here's a quick summary. Last week, Palin claimed that Revere warned the British not to take Americans' arms by "riding his horse through town to send those warning shots and bells." In questioning Palin's understanding of the Revere's midnight ride -- an event historians have undeniably studied in depth, leading to ample academic debate over the specifics -- critics point out that Revere definitely warned the colonists and probably did not do so by firing guns. This likely would've spoiled the clandestine nature of the mission.


Now that is really scary - that so many people would defend Palin's remarks even though she is clearly out in left field.


Thank goodness 60% of Republicans are not ready to turn the White House over to her:

Republican voters might prefer an ill-prepared, historically challenged, constitutionally and politically ignorant former governor as their candidate and might even believe she has the qualifications to be president, but they are not prepared to trust the next election to her.

The woman is so loved that some are willing to alter history for her....... And the ones that willing to do it are the ultimate patriots and defender of all things American and Christian...Republicans.