"Proceed cautiously..." Does not say to me don't do this...
|
|
|
|
|
"Proceed cautiously..." Does not say to me don't do this...
ALABAMA! Wrong example... LOL...
Yes, and the LSU plan does not. He's contradicting himself.Originally Posted by Allgood
He's essentially saying Tech can't give Shreveport a strong 4 year research university.
So we have all the LOCAL people supporting the merger, and some guy who "has spent a lot of time in Shreveport-Bossier" --but doesn't live there-- opposing it?
Nice.
I know!
LSUS President Marsala playing the blame game again.
It will be after the opponents have a chance to testify on the bill.
The House meets at 2 PM today, so the meeting will have to end before then.
Exactly, and now Marsala is arguing that the BoR has blocked the expansion of Role & Scope and it's their fault...So we have all the LOCAL people supporting the merger, and some guy who "has spent a lot of time in Shreveport-Bossier" --but doesn't live there-- opposing it?
Nice.
Which wouldn't that indirectly support the merger? Get away from the LSU system BoR and into a system that will foster growth.
Now saying study was Anti-Shreveport Anti-LSUS...
Marsala's just doing his job, his arguement is based on how they've been held down, does nothing to address the needs of the city, dwindling budget or enrollment.... He sound's half-hearted...
Marsala is STILL playing the blame game. He doesn't present a single reason why keeping the status quo is better than the merger. He wants LSUS to become a national research university.
Doesn't matter how we got here.........only matters that the area needs a 4-year RESEARCH university, and the state can't afford to put money into a new one. Merging with Tech is best alternative.
HD
Carmody to Jenkins: History is history. Let's move forward. Where is the money to implement the LSU Shreveport committment plan?
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote