If we could only do away with the 2nd amendment...things would be okay - says CNN and NBC.
![]() |
![]() |
If we could only do away with the 2nd amendment...things would be okay - says CNN and NBC.
I disagree one on one. A person can produce a knife, move 20 feet, and kill you in less time than it takes to draw a gun. A gun is a tool that when misused can kill more and faster. Although, if a person slams a car into a large crowd, it would likely kill more than one could with most firearms.
So many factors at play.
People not educated in handling firearms are handling firearms. Economic troubles lead to acts of desperation and guns are accessible even to the impoverished. People feel they aren't being heard and feel "forced" to make themselves heard. Crime creates buzz and ratings, so it will be reported.
That is probably a very shallow observation and not a great contribution to the discussion, but those are just my thoughts. Seems to be a perfect storm of conditions leading to a crazy, violent time.
Now here is violence and a hate crime in Maine not being talked about in the media or by Nobama. They are refusing to name them as Muslim nor Somolia as their country of origin.
SLAIN CHRISTIAN'S HEAD ALLEGEDLY BASHED BY MUSLIM 'REFUGEES' in Maine.
Blood-splattered Bible found lying next to victim
Published: 1 day ago
Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2015/08/slain-chr...VL4vkyteTC1.99
http://www.wnd.com/2015/08/slain-chr...slim-refugees/
That's a good point. But the way the Democrats talk, I was still expecting to see a hockey stick graph of gun violence going way up recently and that's just not happening. All firearm deaths (including suicide) has been stable since the beginning of the graph in 1979. I wish I could find a graph covering the past 200 years.
You won't learn this from watching CNN or MSNBC, but if this guy had been checked properly according to the current laws he would not have gotten a gun (or ammo). Reckon why they used a different set of rules when approving him?
Point taken.
You lead me to another thought ...
We seem to have accepted that traffic fatalities are an unfortunate side effect of a society dependent on automobiles, but that the benefits outweigh the costs. Should this also be our attitude regarding firearms?
maddawg hinted at this above, but I still don't think its the right position for either cars or guns.
Another interesting chart showing that homicides do not decrease once guns are taken away. Look at the big spike after guns were banned!
![]()