|
|
Why should I take what any elected official does personally? Why would any non-relative be embarrassed by what any elected official does?Originally Posted by Guisslapp
You are being a drama queen just like the socialist media members and never Trumpers. You lost and you are still losing.
America is losing. It seems as though you have paid full price for this sinking ship and cannot walk away from a bad investment.
Most organizations would fire their CEO for this type of behavior.
All the Dems have is a tweet now to stomp their feet and get PO'd about.
Clinton used a cigar to abuse a young female intern in the Whitehouse and committed perjury. Not too mention Bill also being accused of rape.
It's like you don't know the history of our presidents and their behavior while in the White House. Surely that can't be the case. And I don't write that to suggest his behavior should be defended. I simply point it out because you try to make points like it's unprecedented.
You act like you are some kind of great American patriot and care about our country's well being. You hate losing. I understand that, but you lost and you are still losing.
The person I have voted for has never won. I have had aIot of experience picking people who didn't get elected. So you are wrong.
I am not happy that we have an unstable individual with control over our nuclear codes. I am embarrassed for all the parents that have to explain or excuse the behavior of this non-adult to their kids. I am sad that these kids will not grow up with the same respect for the office of POTUS that I did. For them, the "bully pulpit" will have a more literal meaning. I am embarassed for my country when I talk to international colleagues or when I travel out of the country.
Also, this whole Trump thing is not a good look for you.
You grew up admiring Jimmy Carter and Bill Clinton? You've stated many times you didn't like Ronald Reagan.
Not looking good for me? Hillary would not have been looking good for me. I know you are disappointed, but you lost.
Those two clowns on MSNBC should be thanking Trump for giving them their best week ever. I never even heard of them before this week.
You must be joking. Trump is our last hope for the office of POTUS. Most Americans lost all respect for the office when the Clinton administration made a mockery of it. Obama finished off any hope that even the most optimistic dreamers had for the Washington establishment.
Goodwin: What Democrats won't admit -- President Trump is Obama's…Legacy
Obama’s liberalism paved the way for Donald Trump
By Michael Goodwin
June 24, 2017 |
The rapid pace of change in American life does not exempt politics. Witness how fast Democrats are cycling through scapegoats.
First came Hillary Clinton. When she emerged to gripe about all the reasons she lost last year, except herself, party activists told her to be quiet and go away. She has, for now.
Next came Nancy Pelosi. When Republicans won four contested special elections for House seats, disgruntled Dems turned their fire on their minority leader, telling Pelosi it was time to get out of the way. She refuses, for now.
And now comes Barack Obama. The former president, shredding what was left of his promise not to interfere with his successor, is joining the fight against the repeal of ObamaCare. He called the Senate bill an example of “meanness,” and pledged to campaign for the Democrat in the Virginia governor’s race.
For Republicans, luck can’t get much better. While Clinton and Pelosi were hardly innocent bystanders in the historic rout of Democrats at every level of government, the main culprit was Obama.
It was Obamaism, more than Clintonism or Pelosism, that elected Donald Trump and gave the GOP both houses of Congress. The former president’s coercive liberalism at home and appeasement abroad led to the greatest upset in American politics.
His two biggest achievements, ObamaCare and the Iran nuclear deal, were sold on the backs of lies. President Trump is Obama’s legacy.
And now Dear Leader wants to “help” Dems again. Let’s see how many Clinton and Pelosi critics have the courage to tell him, “No, thanks, you’ve done enough.”
Obama’s desire to re-litigate his tenure comes amid other signs that the siege of the Trump White House is lifting and the political momentum is shifting.
Suddenly, Dems are the fighting, fractured party with no agenda or leader while Republicans finally show signs of uniting their majorities to get big things done.
Indeed, Obama’s return to the fray coincides with a belated congressional focus on his administration’s misconduct on the Clinton investigation and his failure to counter Russian interference in the election.
SEE ALSO
Senate panel looking into Lynch's involvement in Clinton email probe
Most ominously, the Senate Judiciary Committee has opened a probe into whether former Attorney General Loretta Lynch impeded the FBI investigation into Clinton’s private email server, with members from both parties raising concerns about her role. They cited accusations by former FBI Director James Comey and a published report that Lynch promised a top Dem that she would not let the Clinton investigation go far.
It’s hard to believe Lynch won’t be forced to testify publicly, an event that would revisit all the suspect twists and turns of the Clinton probe, including Lynch’s failure to impanel a grand jury. She also should be asked what, if any, orders she got from a White House invested in a Clinton victory.
The role of politics also surfaced when Obama’s former director of homeland security admitted that the administration decided to withhold public discussion about Russian hacking because of its possible impact on the campaign.
“This was a big decision, and there were a lot of considerations that went into it,” Jeh Johnson told the Senate. “This was an unprecedented step.”
He said the White House feared that accusing Russia of interference might have looked like an effort to help Clinton, especially given Trump’s claim that results would be “rigged.”
Obama’s decision to wring his hands and take no action until after the election, when he imposed minor sanctions on individual Russians, might explain his team’s efforts to pin the collusion tag on Trump. Those charges, made mostly by anonymous leaks, are catnip to the Democratic media and distract attention from Obama’s failure to respond to what has been described as a Russian act of war.
Taken together, last week’s extraordinary developments are injecting a dose of reality into the Washington scandal machine. For months, anonymous-sourced reports about various Trump associates having meetings with Russian officials painted a troubling picture and led to the appointment of a special counsel.
But when the Obama team’s role is highlighted, it too looks very troubling. The implications of the president being paralyzed because he didn’t want to give Trump ammunition are almost as grave as the still-unexplained surveillance, leaks and unmasking of Trump associates.
From here, it all looks like the Obama White House is guilty of playing politics with national security.
MORE
http://nypost.com/2017/06/24/obamas-...-donald-trump/
Is our clown in chief's ego keeping us from taking this threat seriously?
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.wir...ck-ukraine/amp
Right, because if Donald Trump doesn't personally look into this, it won't get looked at. Ah....don't we have counter-intelligence agencies, CIA, FBI, the Royal Mounted Police, someone! whose job this is?
Secondly, obummer and your gal Killary knew all about this Russian cyber warfare at least as far back as 2015. But, they covered it up out of fear it would damage her politically.
But, as the good Goose-stepping loyal Nazi that you are, Goosey, you don't blame the National Socialists Party (aka Democraps), nope! it's all Trump's fault. (Are ya sure it ain't Bush's fault? Just asking...)
Embarrassing....
http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank...ident-decline/
Yet, Trump keeps trying to undermine them.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
