We got El A Tech'd again.

[techman05]

Can we at least all agree that we were better off before any changes were made, regardless of which change you support or hate?

[PawDawg]

Can we at least all agree that we were better off before any changes were made, regardless of which change you support or hate?

we have some blindly follow no matter what

[dawg80]

If I were smart, I wouldn't be slinging shit on BBB with you pickleheads

picklehead? That's one of the nicest things someone ever said about Hogdawg.

[Tech52]

Can we at least all agree that we were better off before any changes were made, regardless of which change you support or hate?

If you don't have an issue with it, it makes no difference.

[HogDawg]

Well, Lucy, this reads as you are thoroughly disgusted with Blue Dawg's post. That you totally disagree with it. Like....really? Blue Dawg you are a moron.

Guess you're not smart enough to make a sensible post.

You're slower than a snail. I did disagree with Blue Dawg's post. I responded negatively to his recommendation to add "Ruston" and "Founded in 1894" to the logo.

[HogDawg]

If I were smart, I wouldn't be slinging shit on BBB with you pickleheads

Ain't THAT the truth.

[HogDawg]

Can we at least all agree that we were better off before any changes were made, regardless of which change you support or hate?

We have some who blindly bitch no matter what.

[PawDawg]

If you don't have an issue with it, it makes no difference.

No it means you don't care, which does make a difference.

[HogDawg]

No it means you don't care, which does make a difference.

No, it means you LIKE it.

[Dawgonit]

Can we at least all agree that we were better off before any changes were made

Better off for what?

Because I can say that some of the changes were good. Having a specific blue and red to use (Except lady techsters) is a good thing. A standard State-T logo is also good. Some ideas have been awful, but other things have improved.

[Blue Dawg]

You're slower than a snail. I did disagree with Blue Dawg's post. I responded negatively to his recommendation to add "Ruston" and "Founded in 1894" to the logo.

Which, just so we're clear, were joke responses to the claim that the logo should be more specific.

[techman05]

Better off for what?

Because I can say that some of the changes were good. Having a specific blue and red to use (Except lady techsters) is a good thing. A standard State-T logo is also good. Some ideas have been awful, but other things have improved.

I can agree that having a set list of colors was okay. I’m talking about the name thing mostly. We don’t need anything else beside the state T and Louisiana Tech. I still have a ton of apparel that just has the state T on it and everyone always comments, “did you graduate from Louisiana Tech or just a fan?” No confusion.

[GermDawg]

Can we at least all agree that we were better off before any changes were made, regardless of which change you support or hate?

JOakes on us...

[dawg80]

We're not NIKE. Or McDonalds.

Without PawDawg's "LA" in front of the "TECH", people will have no clue who we are. Of course, that seem's to be fine with some of you.

Well we need to add "Ruston" to it so people are aware of where we are. Probably "founded in 1894" also.

Yes, since so many schools do that, it's important to keep up.

HD: Without words... (HD says w/o words logos don't work)

Blue Dawg: Let's add words...

HD: (sarcastic) Add words because others do it. (So now words on logos don't work)

Got it!

[Champ967]

I think Tech should play nlulm in football.