|










Because many are paid in cash, and if not and then receiving American benefits, liberals in the government keep names like this secret (especially in sanctuary cities). It's a liberal, socialist racket for more votes period!! And the liberal, socialist democrats don't care for the personal safety at all. Otherwise they wouldn't be letting them caravan for thousands of miles with women and young children (many without parents at all) amongst hardened rapist and murderers including muslim terrorist. Again, it's a liberal, socialist racket for more votes period and a one world government without borders!!




















RECORD NUMBER OF ILLEGALS TRYING TO BUY GUNS
FBI says figure outpacing those with mental-health issues
Published: 21 hours ago
Read more at https://www.wnd.com/2019/01/record-n...L09uqtzRVME.99
Well, we all know why that amendment is in there, so at this point it should be repealed. It is an attractive nusiance that will eventually destroy our economy and our culture (and lead to the unintended deaths of many people coming here for the free cheese).
The Constitution says our rights to bear arms shall not be infringed. Yet we have tons of "common sense" gun laws telling us what we can have and when and where we can have them.










Common sense gun control=using both hands
That is my thought as well.
Look at how various agendas have been able to pervert the interpretation of the Constitution.
The second amendment was there to make sure citizens could both protect the nation and revolt against a tyranical government. As such, it makes sense for citizens to own the same types of weapons the government owns, or at least to own the same ones that would not involve our mutual complete destruction (like nukes). Common sense, based on the intent of the second amendment, would exclude any laws restricting such ownership, yet here we are accepting that the government has the right to infringe on this right because it is unreasonable.
Same with the "anchor baby" amendment. It is being perverted to show the intent of that amendment was to allow for those here illegally to create legal citizens just by giving birth inside the borders. That was not the intent of the amendment.
Who is on the Supreme court matters. I hope Trump gets another shot at a justice.




















Of course the socialist, liberal Dems don't care and won't show this in their media.
Nearly 400 Migrants Died Crossing U.S. Border in 2018...
President invokes Vatican's 'biggest wall of all'...
It is harder to get thru security at your typical airport than it is to get past the wall at the Vatican. It no longer serves a defensive or security purpose.
The Vatican Wall was first built in the 9th Century to guard St. Peter's from bands of pirates and other bad people. Later it was enhanced when the moooslims, the Ottoman Empire, was invading and threatening Christian Europe. The wall got one final enhancement in the 18th Century and one more defensive inclusion in the 19th Century during Italy's numerous civil wars, factions fighting each other for control of the whole country, and when the French, under Napoleon III, were trying to flex their international military muscle. In the late 1850's France invaded Italy and wanted to take down the Vatican. Under Italian hero Garibaldi, a self-made general, the French wasted their strength trying to attack the Vatican, and its 40-foot high, 20-foot thick wall, lined with heavy cannons. The French did knock down a gate and gain entrance into the Vatican at one place (one of six big gates at the time), but their forces were so depleted that an Italian counter-attack drove the French out. The French gave up and moved on to other, less defended cities like Venice and Florence.
Ironically, Garibaldi was NOT Roman Catholic, or even a Christian per se. He did not support the Papal political power in Italy, as it had been. Garibaldi was a republican. He wanted to see a united Italy with a constitution and duly elected leaders. But, he also recognized the positive influence the Pope could have in uniting Italy. And, he detested any foreign invaders, so he was gonna fight the French wherever they were. Only Garibaldi could have rallied various Italian factions to come to the aid of the Vatican. Heck! even troops from Naples took part in the defense of the Vatican against the French, and Naples HATED Rome in general, and the Vatican in particular. But, they respected Garibaldi and when he asked Naples to send troops to help....they did.
Anyway, I digress (which I often do when it comes to history). Point is the Vatican Wall was built and enhanced during times when such walls were needed. Today it is just an interesting historic relic...like the pyramids in Egypt...the Great Wall of China...or the various brick and mortar forts, like Fort Pike and Fort Jackson near New Orleans, state parks. There is security at the Vatican, but they don't depend on "the wall" for it. That said, yes, because it exists, there is a couple portions of the wall that make security a little easier. They have only to monitor the top of the wall for intruders, and of course the various gates through it. But other portions, and thus direct access to St. Peter's Square, are open and only metal detector check points exist for entry. I've been there several times, I know.










I don’t know about that. My sister-in-law flew out of Monroe a few years ago with only a library card.
Meanwhile, Trump is holding up pay for TSA employees for his dumb border wall.