Presidential Election 2020

[DawgyNWindow]

Biden’s Energy Policies Could Kill 160,000 Michigan Jobs, Decimate Auto Manufacturing, and Create California-Style Rolling Blackouts all to help out China and make certain liberal Dems and their families filthy rich. The Biden’s are crooks!



https://www.breitbart.com/2020-elect...ing-blackouts/

If they outlaw fracking, buy all the oil stocks you can because the price is going up and all those wells that are too expensive to drill in an oversupplied market will suddenly become gold mines.

At least China will have to pay more for it as well, but won't be subject to the same regulations and taxes, giving them a comparable advantage. Goosey calls this capitalism.

For those that have bought into the incorrect "fracking is bad" narrative, the truth is that fracking has been used for a long time in America and elsewhere. What has changed is the ability to do horizontal drilling. This isn't new.

[Guisslapp]

Biden unambiguously said he would not ban fracking. Why are we talking about banning fracking?

[PawDawg]

Biden unambiguously said he would not ban fracking. Why are we talking about banning fracking?

Because he had already said he would… Several times. And he is a liar

[Bulldawg81]

Biden unambiguously said he would not ban fracking. Why are we talking about banning fracking?

That was after he said he would ban fracking, right? So, which is it?

[johnnylightnin]

That was after he said he would ban fracking, right? So, which is it?

Only thing that really matters is what PA voters think. If they believe him, he'll win PA and the presidency. If they don't, 4 more years.

[DawgyNWindow]

Biden unambiguously said he would not ban fracking. Why are we talking about banning fracking?

I guess it depends on which statement you believe. The ones he made when he felt comfortable with his lead or the ones he made when he saw it eroding.

Now Trump unambiguously repudiated white supremacy and white supremacists many times (even during the times you try to quote as evidence that he did not). Why are you still talking about that?

[dawg80]

Touche'

[Guisslapp]

I guess it depends on which statement you believe. The ones he made when he felt comfortable with his lead or the ones he made when he saw it eroding.

Now Trump unambiguously repudiated white supremacy and white supremacists many times (even during the times you try to quote as evidence that he did not). Why are you still talking about that?

Guess Trump finally realized racism wasn’t polling well.

[dawg80]

Guess Trump finally realized racism wasn’t polling well.

Right! except for the fact Trump is on video saying he condemns racism back in 2016 and 2017. Guess he knew "he wouldn't be polling well" in 2020, back then.

[glm47]

Guess Trump finally realized racism wasn’t polling well.

Gullible Goober projecting again.

You’re supporting the racists. Does that make you one?

[FriscoDog]

Biden said in last debate that he wants to basically kill the O&G industry.. Tens of millions of jobs would be lost as a result.. Well as Biden said to the coal miners.. guess they can learn to code..

BTW.. those nice big green deal windmills... when they are at end of life.. there is only one place in entire us that will take them.. because they do not decompose and they are toxic.. Also, when they freeze, up, they have to have helicopters fly and spray glycol on the blades to de-ice them just as they do on aircraft. At DFW, and other major airports, they have a special place for de-icing and separate drainage systems to capture runoff as it too is toxic.. not so out in the heartland and fields.. all that nice glycol spills into the ground and runs in to nearby streams... no different than if it were an oil spill or other hazardous spill..

All those environmentalists don't think about that side of it..

[Guisslapp]

Biden said in last debate that he wants to basically kill the O&G industry.. Tens of millions of jobs would be lost as a result.. Well as Biden said to the coal miners.. guess they can learn to code..

BTW.. those nice big green deal windmills... when they are at end of life.. there is only one place in entire us that will take them.. because they do not decompose and they are toxic.. Also, when they freeze, up, they have to have helicopters fly and spray glycol on the blades to de-ice them just as they do on aircraft. At DFW, and other major airports, they have a special place for de-icing and separate drainage systems to capture runoff as it too is toxic.. not so out in the heartland and fields.. all that nice glycol spills into the ground and runs in to nearby streams... no different than if it were an oil spill or other hazardous spill..

All those environmentalists don't think about that side of it..

No he didn’t. He talked about a transition away from the oil industry over time. Which is basically in the cards no matter who is president. There is a transition to renewables under way and they are gaining market share. The transition will take a long time, but these things usually go faster than most people imagine. Still we are talking about a decades long process, not something to happen over the next 10 years,

[FriscoDog]

Also found it hilarious today when Twitter CEO was grilled by senators.. when asked.. Why do you censor anything negative about Biden such as the whistle blower claims and NY Post story?? He said that policies are put in place to not publish "lies".. So immediately that same senator asked then why did he allow the Iran Iatollah say that the holocaust was a myth and not true.. His response was that was "mis information". WOW...

[PawDawg]

No he didn’t. He talked about a transition away from the oil industry over time. Which is basically in the cards no matter who is president. There is a transition to renewables under way and they are gaining market share. The transition will take a long time, but these things usually go faster than most people imagine. Still we are talking about a decades long process, not something to happen over the next 10 years,

"...by 2025" is what he said. You know what he said, but you are saying what you wanted him to say.

[Guisslapp]

"...by 2025" is what he said. You know what he said, but you are saying what you wanted him to say.

“We have to move toward net zero emissions. The first place to do that by the year 2035 is in energy production, by 2050 totally.”