Democrat voter fraud is on!

[FriscoDawg]

Guess which network Dominion Voting Systems uses? You got it, SolarWinds. Most secure election in history, CISA? I think not.

WASHINGTON – The Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) tonight issued Emergency Directive 21-01, in response to a known compromise involving SolarWinds Orion products that are currently being exploited by malicious actors. This Emergency Directive calls on all federal civilian agencies to review their networks for indicators of compromise and disconnect or power down SolarWinds Orion products immediately.

“The compromise of SolarWinds’ Orion Network Management Products poses unacceptable risks to the security of federal networks,” said CISA Acting Director Brandon Wales. “Tonight’s directive is intended to mitigate potential compromises within federal civilian networks, and we urge all our partners—in the public and private sectors—to assess their exposure to this compromise and to secure their networks against any exploitation.”

This is the fifth Emergency Directive issued by CISA under the authorities granted by Congress in the Cybersecurity Act of 2015. All agencies operating SolarWinds products should provide a completion report to CISA by 12pm Eastern Standard Time on Monday December 14, 2020.

Here is the CISA announcement:

CISA ISSUES EMERGENCY DIRECTIVE TO MITIGATE THE COMPROMISE OF SOLARWINDS ORION NETWORK MANAGEMENT PRODUCTS
https://www.cisa.gov/news/2020/12/13...-orion-network

[FriscoDawg]

Dominion voting machines have no issues? Hardly.

December 14, 2020 | 09:15 ET

Moments ago, Michigan state judge Kevin Elensheimer ordered the release of a redacted report on the results of an examination of the Dominion voting machines in Antrim County, Michigan.

The results had been shielded by a protective order, but this morning, Judge Elensheimer removed that order, clearing the way for the audit results to go public.

The judge further ordered that the case move to the discovery phase and mentioned the case could go to trial by April of 2021.

A forensic audit of Dominion Voting Systems machines and software in Michigan showed that they were designed to create fraud and influence election results, a data firm said Monday. “We conclude that the Dominion Voting System is intentionally and purposefully designed with inherent errors to create systemic fraud and influence election results,” Russell Ramsland Jr., co-founder of Allied Security Operations.

[johnnylightnin]

You were okay with it in the La governor run off

I’m ok with it now. If prominent players in the party want to suppress their own vote, who am I to argue? Maybe that would wake up the still reasonable Trump supporters. Probably not, but we can hope.

[TYLERTECHSAS]

Typical elitist Dem double standard.

Published 13 hours ago
Kevin McCarthy calls Nancy Pelosi out over House voting inconsistency: 'Her power is more important'

McCarthy's criticism of Pelosi comes as Congress and the White House remain at a months-long stalemate over a new round of coronavirus stimulus.

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/kev...more-important

[Guisslapp]

Guess which network Dominion Voting Systems uses? You got it, SolarWinds. Most secure election in history, CISA? I think not.

WASHINGTON – The Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) tonight issued Emergency Directive 21-01, in response to a known compromise involving SolarWinds Orion products that are currently being exploited by malicious actors. This Emergency Directive calls on all federal civilian agencies to review their networks for indicators of compromise and disconnect or power down SolarWinds Orion products immediately.

“The compromise of SolarWinds’ Orion Network Management Products poses unacceptable risks to the security of federal networks,” said CISA Acting Director Brandon Wales. “Tonight’s directive is intended to mitigate potential compromises within federal civilian networks, and we urge all our partners—in the public and private sectors—to assess their exposure to this compromise and to secure their networks against any exploitation.”

This is the fifth Emergency Directive issued by CISA under the authorities granted by Congress in the Cybersecurity Act of 2015. All agencies operating SolarWinds products should provide a completion report to CISA by 12pm Eastern Standard Time on Monday December 14, 2020.

Here is the CISA announcement:

CISA ISSUES EMERGENCY DIRECTIVE TO MITIGATE THE COMPROMISE OF SOLARWINDS ORION NETWORK MANAGEMENT PRODUCTS
https://www.cisa.gov/news/2020/12/13...-orion-network

Paper ballots and paper records are used for the audit.

[Guisslapp]

Dominion voting machines have no issues? Hardly.

December 14, 2020 | 09:15 ET

Moments ago, Michigan state judge Kevin Elensheimer ordered the release of a redacted report on the results of an examination of the Dominion voting machines in Antrim County, Michigan.

The results had been shielded by a protective order, but this morning, Judge Elensheimer removed that order, clearing the way for the audit results to go public.

The judge further ordered that the case move to the discovery phase and mentioned the case could go to trial by April of 2021.

A forensic audit of Dominion Voting Systems machines and software in Michigan showed that they were designed to create fraud and influence election results, a data firm said Monday. “We conclude that the Dominion Voting System is intentionally and purposefully designed with inherent errors to create systemic fraud and influence election results,” Russell Ramsland Jr., co-founder of Allied Security Operations.

Lol. Ramsland is a former Republican congressional candidate. His report is misleading to say the least.

[FriscoDawg]

More from the Dominion audit report....

“Significantly, the computer system shows vote adjudication logs for prior years; but all adjudication log entries for the 2020 election cycle are missing. The adjudication process is the simplest way to manually manipulate votes. The lack of records prevents any form of audit accountability, and their conspicuous absence is extremely suspicious since the files exist for previous years using the same software,” the report, authored by Russell Ramsland, states.

“We must conclude that the 2020 election cycle records have been manually removed.”

“The allowable election error rate established by the Federal Election Commission guidelines is of 1 in 250,000 ballots,” Ramsland said. “We observed an error rate of 68.05 percent. This demonstrated a significant and fatal error in security and election integrity.”

“These errors resulted in overall tabulation errors or ballots being sent to adjudication. This high error rates proves the Dominion Voting System is flawed and does not meet state or federal election laws,” he added.

“Because the intentional high error rate generates large numbers of ballots to be adjudicated by election personnel, we must deduce that bulk adjudication occurred. However, because files and adjudication logs are missing, we have not yet determined where the bulk adjudication occurred or who was responsible for it. Our research continues.”

In addition to missing adjudication logs, the examination found that the systems are also missing security logs prior to 11 p.m. on Nov. 4.

“This means that all security logs for the day after the election, on Election Day, and prior to Election Day are gone. Security logs are very important to an audit trail, forensics, and for detecting advanced persistent threats and outside attacks, especially on systems with outdated system files,” Ramsland said.

“These logs would contain domain controls, authentication failures, error codes, times users logged on and off, network connections to file servers between file accesses, internet connections, times, and data transfers,” he added. “Other server logs before November 4, 2020 are present; therefore, there is no reasonable explanation for the security logs to be missing.”

[PawDawg]

How will the parrots explain this?

[Guisslapp]

More from the Dominion audit report....

“Significantly, the computer system shows vote adjudication logs for prior years; but all adjudication log entries for the 2020 election cycle are missing. The adjudication process is the simplest way to manually manipulate votes. The lack of records prevents any form of audit accountability, and their conspicuous absence is extremely suspicious since the files exist for previous years using the same software,” the report, authored by Russell Ramsland, states.

“We must conclude that the 2020 election cycle records have been manually removed.”

“The allowable election error rate established by the Federal Election Commission guidelines is of 1 in 250,000 ballots,” Ramsland said. “We observed an error rate of 68.05 percent. This demonstrated a significant and fatal error in security and election integrity.”

“These errors resulted in overall tabulation errors or ballots being sent to adjudication. This high error rates proves the Dominion Voting System is flawed and does not meet state or federal election laws,” he added.

“Because the intentional high error rate generates large numbers of ballots to be adjudicated by election personnel, we must deduce that bulk adjudication occurred. However, because files and adjudication logs are missing, we have not yet determined where the bulk adjudication occurred or who was responsible for it. Our research continues.”

In addition to missing adjudication logs, the examination found that the systems are also missing security logs prior to 11 p.m. on Nov. 4.

“This means that all security logs for the day after the election, on Election Day, and prior to Election Day are gone. Security logs are very important to an audit trail, forensics, and for detecting advanced persistent threats and outside attacks, especially on systems with outdated system files,” Ramsland said.

“These logs would contain domain controls, authentication failures, error codes, times users logged on and off, network connections to file servers between file accesses, internet connections, times, and data transfers,” he added. “Other server logs before November 4, 2020 are present; therefore, there is no reasonable explanation for the security logs to be missing.”

Ramsland doesn’t have a great track record for accuracy. Remember he was the one citing Minnesota counties for Michigan counties in that affidavit.

https://www.freep.com/story/news/loc...ut/3829654001/

The author of this report is a clown.

[dawg80]

How will the parrots explain this?

As usual, can't dispute the message? Attack the messenger. Just watch.

[dawg80]

LOL! dang I couldn't even finish posting my comment and the #1 moron had already jumped in to prove my point!

[Guisslapp]

LOL! dang I couldn't even finish posting my comment and the #1 moron had already jumped in to prove my point!

The guy who wrote the report has a history of misrepresenting data in this very election. He said in an affidavit that some counties in Michigan had over 100% turnout, but was citing counties in Minnesota for the registration numbers. A healthy dose of skepticism is warranted.

[dawg80]

The guy who wrote the report has a history of misrepresenting data in this very election. He said in an affidavit that some counties in Michigan had over 100% turnout, but was citing counties in Minnesota for the registration numbers. A healthy dose of skepticism is warranted.

That sentence taken on its own is applicable in all situations. And, that includes when applied to this:

the 2020 POTUS election was 100%, or very close to 100%, legit.

Even the most ardent TDS-suffered has to, or should, concede it is possible there was significant voter fraud and/or irregularities. It remains a "possibility." There are all kinds of types of voter irregularities that would shed some doubt on the results.

For instance, in the infamous Edwin Edwards vs. David Duke gubernatorial election the mayor of New Orleans allowed, well, not only allowed, but ordered city busses to go into black neighborhoods and ferry voters to the polls. That is completely illegal. It should have been stopped, even before it started, and the mayor brought up on charges for malfeasance. Instead, he was applauded for it. Not saying none of those voters, who rode the bus, were not legit voters, but that the whole operation violated the law and one could argue all those votes should have been thrown out. Doesn't matter what you think of the candidates involved in that race, or any race. In the 2020 POTUS election, and in others, Dems/libs have gotten away with illegal crap just like that. Hell, I even posted about the illegal "canvassing" that went on in favor of a Dem candidate here in Natchitoches. That candidate still lost, but doesn't make it right.

So, yeah, folks should not be ostriches and depend on CNN et al for their "news." A healthy dose of skepticism is warranted.

[Guisslapp]

That sentence taken on its own is applicable in all situations. And, that includes when applied to this:

the 2020 POTUS election was 100%, or very close to 100%, legit.

Even the most ardent TDS-suffered has to, or should, concede it is possible there was significant voter fraud and/or irregularities. It remains a "possibility." There are all kinds of types of voter irregularities that would shed some doubt on the results.

For instance, in the infamous Edwin Edwards vs. David Duke gubernatorial election the mayor of New Orleans allowed, well, not only allowed, but ordered city busses to go into black neighborhoods and ferry voters to the polls. That is completely illegal. It should have been stopped, even before it started, and the mayor brought up on charges for malfeasance. Instead, he was applauded for it. Not saying none of those voters, who rode the bus, were not legit voters, but that the whole operation violated the law and one could argue all those votes should have been thrown out. Doesn't matter what you think of the candidates involved in that race, or any race. In the 2020 POTUS election, and in others, Dems/libs have gotten away with illegal crap just like that. Hell, I even posted about the illegal "canvassing" that went on in favor of a Dem candidate here in Natchitoches. That candidate still lost, but doesn't make it right.

So, yeah, folks should not be ostriches and depend on CNN et al for their "news." A healthy dose of skepticism is warranted.

Well, it is just as likely that the irregularities or the fraud went in Trump’s favor. So since there is no evidence of substantial irregularity or fraud, I don’t see the point of getting turned up over it.

[techman05]

Guiss, when have you ever disagreed with anything that you also agreed was legit?