Political nonsense. Just like all those celebrities who were gonna move to Canada if Trump won in 2016. They didn't.Originally Posted by techman05
|
|
|
|
|
Political nonsense. Just like all those celebrities who were gonna move to Canada if Trump won in 2016. They didn't.
Glad that not everyone put so much trust in Trump’s treatment - HCQ.
Again, he may have been wrong about treating ALL Covid with HCQ, but it is affective in earliest stages and as a preventative. Your savior, Fauci, hasn’t been right yet. No idea how he still has a job. He must have something on everyone in Washington.
Not it isn’t. The gold standard randomized control trials proved otherwise. Zero randomized trials proved it worked or helped for COVID.
Let's accept that Trump was 100% wrong about HCQ...so! all of you who hate Trump and think he NEVER did anything right/good should avoid his vaccines like, well, the plague! I said that months ago, ONLY Trump supporters should be eligible for his vaccines.
The rest of you can just follow your leaders' guidance, you know, like guvnar Coma and put virus-positive patients back in nursing homes, in the same room as your grandma. You know, like Pelosi who invited everyone to go to Chinatown and rub shoulders and breathe on each other. You know, like mayor De-blah-sio who said, take the subways! You know, like Biden who is inviting untested, virus-positive illegals to flood across the border and all go sneeze on Goosey!
Yep! only Trumpsters should get the vaccines and the rest of you can just take your chances listening to Fauci! LOL!
So, the local doctors on the ground actually administering and prescribing means nothing? I’ll trust my doctor who doesn’t have a hand in someone else’s pocket over some trial by people who are undoubtedly being influenced by someone.
It is anecdotal, so the local doctors can’t possibly know whether it was a specific aspect of their treatment that made a difference or the confluence of other factors. That is why you do these big double blind randomized control trials.
Don't overlook the fact that Facebook has now been ordered by its own Oversight Board to rescind its ban on reporting on HCQ.
They were wrong, and even the AMA admits its opposition to HCQ was wrong.
You are wrong and deeply confused.
On FB - https://oversightboard.com/news/3251...20-006-fb-fbr/
On AMA -
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.abc...1-06949c2220ae
In the bigger picture, the fact that FB has such an oversight board shows they are indeed a publisher, editing, denying posts/material, etc... that's fine if they want to do that but then they should be open to lawsuits when someone has a legit gripe with their selective censorship.
They have asked for DC to help them regulate how they moderate.
The only reason this action has been taken now is to try to mitigate some of the lawsuits that are coming.
I agree that the exercise of control and oversight are both qualities only exhibited by a publisher.
Oh brother. 🙄
Remember?
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.ind...701.html%3famp
Not surprising, but good to see the early data confirm what was hoped. Astrazenaca/Oxford vaccine shown to cut transmission.
https://www.nytimes.com/2021/02/03/u...s-vaccine.html
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote