Democrat voter fraud is on!

[Guisslapp]

There is NO voter suppression, anywhere! that's one point. And a large part of the 2020 record turnout was dead people voting multiple times for Biden. And all the fake ballots as well.

Since 2020 had such great turnout without systemic fraud issues, why did so many states think they needed to create new voter suppression laws?

[PawDawg]

Did you read the article? 2020 election set record turnout with less voter suppression.

Since 2020 had such great turnout without systemic fraud issues, why did so many states think they needed to create new voter suppression laws?

Turn out

You people have a new system..."Okay votes are in. How many do we need to count in our favor?"

[techman05]

Not sure Goosey read the article. It would appear that any voter suppression would be in those states with lower percentage of minority turnout. You know, blue states.

[inudesu]

Note the maricopa.gov website talks about two audits that already have been completed and found no issues whatsoever.

Have no idea when that article was published, but as of this afternoon the audit was ongoing.. No way they could have posted the findings that fast.. I would expect that info is old and dated.


BREAKING: FEAR-MONGERING FAIL! — Arizona Court Rules Maricopa County Audit Will Go On – No Temporary Restraining Order!

By Joe Hoft
Published April 28, 2021 at 2:44pm
1256 Comments

It sounds like whatever audit we're up to now isn't going too well. A lot of the problems listed here are the kinds of things that might just raise some eyebrows if we were talking about "the other side" using these tactics (correctly).

https://thedispatch.com/p/what-the-h...on-in-maricopa

Probably don't want a guy who was on the ballot (and lost) helping out in the audit do we? And you'd think they'd understand some of the basic functional requirements (like why you'd avoid certain pen colors or not bother with a UV light). I'd think you'd also want to hire a company who normally does this kind of thing, too.

But you know, third time's the charm!

[FriscoDawg]

It sounds like whatever audit we're up to now isn't going too well. A lot of the problems listed here are the kinds of things that might just raise some eyebrows if we were talking about "the other side" using these tactics (correctly).

https://thedispatch.com/p/what-the-h...on-in-maricopa

Probably don't want a guy who was on the ballot (and lost) helping out in the audit do we? And you'd think they'd understand some of the basic functional requirements (like why you'd avoid certain pen colors or not bother with a UV light). I'd think you'd also want to hire a company who normally does this kind of thing, too.

But you know, third time's the charm!

What were the full hand recount results again from the first two "audits"? Oh, that's right, there aren't any because no full hand recount was done.

And the UV light inspection is to 1) spot ballots printed on paper different from paper that official ballots were printed on, 2) to spot items such as creases from folds that should be present on mailed in ballots, and 3) to determine how the ballots were marked (manually as they are supposed to be or by machine-printed marks).

The process looks to be totally transparent to me, and the hand recount looks to be as legit as possible. Three counters record each batch of 100 ballots, and they don't sign off on the batch and start on the next batch of 100 until all three counters have the same result.

[dawg80]

Since 2020 had such great turnout without systemic fraud issues, why did so many states think they needed to create new voter suppression laws?

There are NO voter suppression laws...anywhere. Period.

There was, and will be again, vast voter fraud in favor of the Dems unless some measures are put in place.

[inudesu]

What were the full hand recount results again from the first two "audits"? Oh, that's right, there aren't any because no full hand recount was done.

And the UV light inspection is to 1) spot ballots printed on paper different from paper that official ballots were printed on, 2) to spot items such as creases from folds that should be present on mailed in ballots, and 3) to determine how the ballots were marked (manually as they are supposed to be or by machine-printed marks).

The process looks to be totally transparent to me, and the hand recount looks to be as legit as possible. Three counters record each batch of 100 ballots, and they don't sign off on the batch and start on the next batch of 100 until all three counters have the same result.

You think it's a great idea to have a guy who lost a race on this ballot out there helping count?

That seems like a bit of a conflict.

[FriscoDog]

You think it's a great idea to have a guy who lost a race on this ballot out there helping count?

That seems like a bit of a conflict.

So is the AZ sec of state (D) trying to sneak a staffer into the counting room disguised as a reporter.

[inudesu]

So is the AZ sec of state (D) trying to sneak a staffer into the counting room disguised as a reporter.

Sure. Don't do that either.

[dawg80]

Speaking of turnout....

There were more cops at Sleepy Joe's press conference in Lake Chuck than spectators/supporters. This is disgusting! And you want to tell me he won the election? Bullshit! No one likes Sleepy Joe, no one ever shows up, and for the most part no one voted for him. Fake ballots!

[TYLERTECHSAS]

There is NO voter suppression, anywhere! that's one point. And a large part of the 2020 record turnout was dead people voting multiple times for Biden. And all the fake ballots as well.

100% correct!!!

[BullPupN'46]

[QUOTE=inudesu;1798389]You think it's a great idea to have a guy who lost a race on this ballot out there helping count?

No. But he sure as hell should have his representatives over seeing the recount and not have the original counters do the recount. All candidates who were on the how ballots should be recounted and he results published. Had that been done in Georgia, there more than likely a different result. I wonder, in the 2020 election, how many ballots were marked for Biden and no other candidates running for office???????

[inudesu]

I wonder, in the 2020 election, how many ballots were marked for Biden and no other candidates running for office???????

No rule against that.

[techman05]

No rule against that.

True, but there is undoubtedly some research showing a typical percentage in past elections versus the percentage of ballots in this last election. I think that is the major issue for most conservatives. Why did precincts have a historical average going back 40 years of 72% voter turnout and a 96% turnout in 2020? Not saying there was cheating, but abnormal voter behavior is more than obvious. Why and how? In the past, there may have been 18% of ballots with 1 selection and the rest blank. What was they percentage now and did those ballots come from areas that typically vote a certain way? Or do those constituents usually fill in their whole ballot and decided not to just this one time?

[dawg80]

True, but there is undoubtedly some research showing a typical percentage in past elections versus the percentage of ballots in this last election. I think that is the major issue for most conservatives. Why did precincts have a historical average going back 40 years of 72% voter turnout and a 96% turnout in 2020? Not saying there was cheating, but abnormal voter behavior is more than obvious. Why and how?

And those 120% turnouts in all those Dem precincts!