|
|
The Russia investigation started because of what Papadopolous told the Australian Diplomat in the bar in London, and then the lies that they told the FBI during the investigation. The Steele Dossier and Carter Page was the side show whipping boy of the Republican Party.
After a few drinks I have, I admit, told a few, ahem, exaggerations in a bar! You guys' entire case is based on what some drunk dude said in a bar? LOL too funny!Originally Posted by Guisslapp
Back to the China virus...
a good friend, a woman, had her head shaved because she was losing hair in clumps after recovering from the virus. She was told by her doctors they are seeing this more and more in patients who had and survived a tough bout of the China virus. It is NOT a reaction to the vaccines, but from having the virus. Anyone else hearing this?
Hair loss has been reported, but it's not clear if it's because of the virus itself or for other reasons.
What other reasons could there be?
Holding out for some way they can blame bad orange man.
Stress. Reaction to drugs used to treat them. But probably mostly stress.
I was listening to the radio yesterday and the news guy said that 1 out of 5 new cases of Covid are happening to vaccinated people. I am not hearing any evidence that people that actually had Covid are being reinfected, yet I am still hearing the call by the CDC and others that you should be vaccinated even if you have already had the disease.
It is no wonder there is no trust in this process.
Personally, I took the J&J shot and wish I had not done so.
The vaccine is about preventing hospitalization and death. It is working in that regard…until your immunity wanes or new variants evolve that defeat the immunity.
And natural immunity is vastly superior to the "immunity" you get from the experimental vaccine.
That isn’t necessarily true. In fact, there are certain cases such as HPV, where the exact opposite is true. Natural immunity is not necessarily better.
https://directorsblog.nih.gov/2021/0...-an-infection/
Now, a new NIH-supported study shows that the answer to this question will vary based on how an individual’s antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 were generated: over the course of a naturally acquired infection or from a COVID-19 vaccine. The new evidence shows that protective antibodies generated in response to an mRNA vaccine will look target a broader range of SARS-CoV-2 variants carrying “single letter” changes in a key portion of their spike protein compared to antibodies acquired from an infection.
My wife and I both had hair loss. Neither of us were hospitalized. It *could* be attributed to other things like stress and even the time of year. I learned looking into it that some people shed hair like animals do. Still, it was new for me. I Have never lost hair and hair loss is not a normal thing in my family. I believe it was COVID in my case.
Then I would expect the rate of infection to be greater for those that already had the virus vs those that took the unapproved vaccine.
Not hearing that at all.
Since the vaccine is for emergency purposes, I would not personally take it if I had already had Covid. Kinda silly that they are pushing such a thing. If I start hearing that 1 in 5 new infections or greater are from folks that have previously had the virus, then we can talk.
Which “unapproved” vaccine?
What you are hearing is wrong and goofy. Figures with all the fake news you follow.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
