His patently false assertions are grossly out of step with science and he knows it. He gave no evidence for reasoning, just an opinion that he knows is non-consensus and fringe.
https://blogs.scientificamerican.com...y-transphobia/
|










His patently false assertions are grossly out of step with science and he knows it. He gave no evidence for reasoning, just an opinion that he knows is non-consensus and fringe.
https://blogs.scientificamerican.com...y-transphobia/










I am not giving any opinions. Just telling you all what I am seeing and hearing from the stupid local doctors who obviously missed medicine day at medical school….at least according to some who think they are smarter than these doctors.










I guess you skipped over the facts and basis provided in the Scientific American article. Maybe you even looked up some new journal that was just created solely for the purpose of posting fringe out-of-consensus COVID theories under the title “International… [something or another]. Lol.
When are you know-nothings gonna give up on the Trumpian nonsense and return to planet Earth?










No, l looked that up on my own. XY= male, with exceptions being the extreme minority. XX= female, with exceptions being the extreme minority.
https://www.genome.gov/genetics-glossary/Sex-Chromosome
Oh look, a government site. Goosey has to accept it as fact.










Gender used to refer to language, such as "him" and "her" and other references to the SEX of people in sentences. Of course the so-called "progressives," which refers to progress toward total destruction of freedom, seized control of public education and have had us on a path toward communism since the late 19th Century.










Nope. And there aren’t only two sexes given the fact that there are also intersex people.
https://www.google.com/amp/s/cadehil...-spectrum/amp/
The world is a much more interesting and rich place when you actually try to step out of your tribal bubble and understand it.










No, we have manipulated language to say what we feel it should say. Also, why didn’t you refute the NIH website link I sent? Do you agree with this government source which has decades and decades of human history of XX or XY, with exceptions? That seems like a viable sample size from a data collection, clinical trial standpoint. That is what you want, so, you have it.










And the Trump administrations attempt to redefine gender was entirely rejected by medical professionals and experts.