
Originally Posted by
DawgyNWindow
Winning doesn't even mean anything.
Remember all the "enhanced techniques" we used at Bagram, GTMO and Abu Ghraib? These were war crimes by definition, but nobody was ever charged with them (although the big brass did roll over on the poor privates, sergeants and corporals and present them with bad conduct discharges for following their unwritten guidelines). Heck, is it even legal for us to continue to imprison the inmates at Guantanamo Bay without charging or convicting them of anything? Can you just keep a POW forever once the armed conflict ends? Not that I am for letting them go, because if we have the evidence on them and they are truly evil people, give them their day in court and then execute them.
And no, I do not believe we are the only ones that do these types of things.
To charge someone with a war crime you have to invade their country, beat them into an unconditional surrender, then round up their war criminals and try them. Even if Ukraine pushes Russia out of their country, there will be no war crime tribunals unless they (or someone else) invades Russia and takes over (flying into Moscow to arrest Putin and Russian Generals doesn't seem like a workable plan).