That doesn't complete my graph. You are looking at number of sunspots, not the inverse sunspot cycle length.Originally Posted by saltydawg
|
|
|
|
|
That doesn't complete my graph. You are looking at number of sunspots, not the inverse sunspot cycle length.
Jordan Mills on choosing Tech:
“It’s a great experience seeing them play. It was a good atmosphere. The fans stood up the whole game and never sat down. They have a great fan base.”
I may not know about ratings, but personally for someone who abhors cold weather, this works for me!
My dad lived in Detroit, omg... that place is freezing let alone the South during winters!
It is the sun.
BTW, it is also appropriate for this thread to be on the political forum since that's all discussions about man-made GW are...political. No science at all.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/56456.stm
And for all you sun-doubters (not mentioning any names, NaCly) I want you to be outside the space shuttle the next time one of those non-factor solar flares happens. Can you say....toast!
Are you going to be able to complete it?
If not, please explain the mechanism whereby the inverse sunspot cycle length would impact sea surface temperatures.
"All roads lead to Putin" -- Thomas Jefferson
Don't have the data.
Jordan Mills on choosing Tech:
“It’s a great experience seeing them play. It was a good atmosphere. The fans stood up the whole game and never sat down. They have a great fan base.”
Wrong. AGW is science but what we are going to do about it is political.:icon_wink:
"All roads lead to Putin" -- Thomas Jefferson
The best place to see solar flares is up North in Alaska or Yukon. However, I'm sure you are not suggesting any link between solar flares and global temperatures (or are you?).
"All roads lead to Putin" -- Thomas Jefferson
The sun is the cause of temp fluctuations on Earth. Anyone can google the subject and see article after article from reputable astrophysicists that have studied it and say so. The other side has that goofy algore.
Period. End of story.
Next!
Think about it.
Jordan Mills on choosing Tech:
“It’s a great experience seeing them play. It was a good atmosphere. The fans stood up the whole game and never sat down. They have a great fan base.”
An actuary ran did a correllation study on various sunspot parameters in 2008. Look it up.
Jordan Mills on choosing Tech:
“It’s a great experience seeing them play. It was a good atmosphere. The fans stood up the whole game and never sat down. They have a great fan base.”
I did. If you graph was valid, you can bet your boots it would have been updated. In other words, the correlation after 1990 turned to monkey doo-doo.
I can see the 11 year sunspot cycle influencing weather, but climate is completely a different story.
"All roads lead to Putin" -- Thomas Jefferson
http://digitaldiatribes.wordpress.co...cing-analysis/
Jordan Mills on choosing Tech:
“It’s a great experience seeing them play. It was a good atmosphere. The fans stood up the whole game and never sat down. They have a great fan base.”
You are an idiot. That data was from a 1991 study by Friis-Christensen. There was no data past 1990 because it did not exist at the time of the study.
Jordan Mills on choosing Tech:
“It’s a great experience seeing them play. It was a good atmosphere. The fans stood up the whole game and never sat down. They have a great fan base.”
You clearly didn't.
Jordan Mills on choosing Tech:
“It’s a great experience seeing them play. It was a good atmosphere. The fans stood up the whole game and never sat down. They have a great fan base.”
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote