OMG Assad has WMDs! Imagine that.
Isn't it funny when we found caches of chemical weapons in Iraq after we ousted Saddam "Barry" Hussein the libtards said those are not WMDs. Even idiots on this board echoed the libtard talking point condemning GWB for the invasion since there were never any WMDs in Iraq. I posed the question numerous times, if a chemical warhead that could wipe out an entire village, killing thousands, is not a WMD, how do you define "mass destruction?" No one ever responded with a definition.
But now, since someone in the administration said we want to be sure it was indeed Assad's forces who used the chemical weapon before the US responds, the libtards are going nutso demanding an immediate US response to this "use of a WMD." Oh? So now chemical weapons are WMDs, but when we found them in Iraq, they weren't?