Cal sittin pretty at #83
|
|
|
|
|
Cal sittin pretty at #83
Lol, that's generous.Originally Posted by LeggoDawgs
But yeah, #33? I think that's generous too, even being a homer. I'll take it, and hope we live up to it, but I'll need proof first. If we were returning what we had last year, sure, but this is almost a whole new set of starters. Not that I don't have faith, just being real..
Given the unknowns we have on both sides of the ball, this seems off by a wide margin. I hope he's right and knows something we don't. If I had to rank, with a new QB and losing Dixon I would say a rank in the mid 60's would have been fair.
Seems this poll was heavily influenced by some people's EA Sports NCAA 2016 seasons.
If only they still made that game.
This is just Crazy Talk.
Myerberg looking pretty sharp now.I hope that was 2 Top 40 teams.
http://www.usatoday.com/story/sports...ball/89910608/
Dropped 2 spots
Bigger question is why barely scraping by us popped Arkansas up 10.
cuz that's how good we are
!
Myerberg is up to something
Re: USAToday ReRank 1-128
CBS rankings week 2 (USA Today rankings) [BlueDawg's Sagarin]:
USM 34 (41) [70]
WKU 37 (36) [61]
Marshall 53 (53) [88]
MTSU 54 (69) [69]
UTEP 63 (106) [121]
Rice 74 (83) [129]
Louisiana Tech 80 (35) [81]
ODU 98 (91) [140]
FAU 100 (88) [119]
FIU 111 (102) [146]
UTSA 119 (108) [147]
UNCC 127 (128) [195]
UNT 128 (127) [170]
Composite Ranks (Average):
1. WKU (44.7) 2. USM (48.3)
3. MTSU (64) 4. Marshall (64.7) 5. Louisiana Tech (65.3)
6. Rice (95.3) 7. UTEP (96.7)
7. FAU (102.3) 8. ODU (109.7) 9. FIU (119.7) 10. UTSA (124.7)
11. UNT (128+) 12. UNCC (128++)
Did they even watch the WKU-Rice and LaTech-Ark games? Theres no reason Rice should be higher than us.
It will work out. It usually takes a few weeks.
Probably not
Good old Memorial Gym
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
