The socialist democrats may never lose an election again in states/cities that have made it so easy to vote by mail or without an ID.
|
|
|
|
|
The socialist democrats may never lose an election again in states/cities that have made it so easy to vote by mail or without an ID.
Republicans have known voter turnout is their enemy for a long time now. That is why voter suppression is a big part of their game.Originally Posted by PawDawg
LOL! Yeah...by insisting it's ONE PERSON, ONE VOTE and that person has the legal right to vote...that makes it voter "suppression." Repubs want to deny my dead grandparents from voting! How dare they!
I suppose it's just a coincidence in those places (states) with proper control of the voting process Repubs do very well. No, Repubs don't always win...such as the election of JBE (D) as Louisiana governor...there were other well-documented reasons, not voter fraud or "irregularities."
We all know you, Goosey, are a dyed-in-the-wool commie globalist and you don't care how, you just want the destruction of America. So voter cheating is part of the recipe. But, just say it.
According to you your logic a drivers license is drivers suppression.
Requiring an ID to get on a flight is airline suppression.
...the list is long.
Voting is NOT right.
Voting is a right and there is no requirement in the Constitution to have an ID, photo or otherwise.
IDs really aren’t the main way Republicans engage in voter suppression these days. It has more to do with limiting polling locations (including shutting down polling locations in black communities), overly complicated registration procedures (including lengthy periods to register before an election), an over complicated procedures for alternative ballots (see Pennsylvania’s silly secrecy ballot requirement).
This stuff really happens and it is Republican tactics to make it harder for people that they think will not vote for them to actually vote. It is unAmerican and shameful.
Lies
Voting is not a right.
It's amazing how you socialist cherry pick the Constitution to fit your hate of America narrative.
You must be an originalist...
I am not an originalist, but since you guys claim to be, I am arguing within your framework.
If voting isn’t a right, how do you explain the 15th, 19th and 26th amendments referring to a right to vote?
This was on CNN last night. They seemed a bit panicked.
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/wp-...F-1536x802.jpg
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/202...rump-2020-win/ This link CNN was talking about. Sorry but hard to edit on phone.
No it wasn’t. You are so gullible. That was before the election (Sept 27), when Fareed was explaining why Trump was attacking the idea of mail-in voting.
Even the time stamp on that video shows “7:03 am” which isn’t at night.
Fareed basically laid out Trump’s Hail Mary strategy more than a month earlier than it played out. His program is great.
https://www.cnn.com/videos/tv/2020/0...reeds-take.cnn
It's even worse than CNN is reporting because any election resolution wouldn't happen until the next Congress is already seated.
The next Congress will have either 26 or 27 Republican majority House delegations depending on Iowa 2nd (Republican leads by 8 votes as recounting continues). Democrats have a majority of only 20 House delegations (not 23). MI, MN, and PA (not just PA) are evenly split, and Iowa would be split if the current GOP lead is erased.
Final breakdown will be either 27-20-3 GOP or 26-20-4 GOP.
That wasn’t “reporting.” This was on GPS on Sept 27 before there were any election results. Fareed was offering an explanation as to why he thought Trump was attacking the mail-in ballots. That episode was quite prescient, but not really a surprise, because Fareed does good work.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote