Printable View
That is what a trial is for and now impeachments have worked in the past. The House called them and Trump blocked them. The House called them again and now the Republicans are trying to impose an illogical procedural block that has never been used before.Quote:
Originally Posted by PawDawg
It is transparent and Americans are getting to watch Republicans participate in a cover up.
They have no integrity left.
In no trial ever before has anyone ever blocked someone from bringing in any new evidence that wasn’t available/provided at the time of the indictment.
It is illogical. It is inconsistent with the point of a trial. I know you are capable of understanding this.
They have the transcript of Trump's phone call that they used to accuse him of a crime and it shows no crime was committed. There is no quid pro quo. Trump is not going to get impeached and removed from office. No Republican is going to the dark side. All of the votes so far have been 53-47.Quote:
Originally Posted by Guisslapp
They have NOTHING. If they did, the system would allow it in. Instead you want them to make crap up like they've been trying to do for 3 years.Quote:
Originally Posted by Guisslapp
New crime now. The socialists are still looking for the crime, but they say it is different now. They think they can work like the FBI and make crap up as the go along.Quote:
Originally Posted by DONW
Trying to listen to shafty Schiff. Basically, they have 1 article of impeachment. Their second article is moot since they refused to follow procedure and take their document and witness requests to the courts. The simple remedy for that is to go to the courts. So, now we have 1 article stating that he asked for a personal favor when he asked Ukraine to do the country a favor. Did I miss anything?
Apparently you missed everythingQuote:
Originally Posted by techman05
The Constitution doesn’t even require the impeachment be for a “crime” - “high crimes and misdemeanors” has a specific meaning at common law in England at the time the Constitution was drafted. Trump’s conduct is of the nature that the framers were specifically concerned with when they insisted on including impeachment/removal in the Constitution.Quote:
Originally Posted by PawDawg
You keep getting hoodwinked.
Democrats can't get away with telling lies in order to impeach Trump. Roberts has already warned them. He's not going to put up with this crap.Quote:
Originally Posted by Guisslapp
Hoodwinked = not believing the lies of the drive by media.Quote:
Originally Posted by Guisslapp
You are the one being hood winked. Your extremely high IQ does not make up for the nasty combo of hate for Trump and gullibility.
My intelligence is average. My ability to contextualize and critically engage information is better than most.Quote:
Originally Posted by PawDawg
No he didn’t. Why are you lying?Quote:
Originally Posted by DONW
:laugh:Quote:
Originally Posted by Guisslapp
Shameful that FoxNews is showing Tucker Carlson talk about Bernie when the most damning evidence is being presented in the trial. Ridiculous.
He said this last night after Nadler gave his speech which was nothing but lies. He said you need to "remember where you are" when you're are making your speeches. In other words you're in the house of the senate and you need to stop lying. He said this after a democrat spoke.Quote:
Originally Posted by Guisslapp
Wrong on both accounts. Roberts made his comment immediately following WH Cipollone’s statement - not immediately after Nadler’s.Quote:
Originally Posted by DONW
Second, his comment was NOT an admonition against lying - it was against improper decorum of the representatives hurling insults at each other.
Why are you lying about this? Where did you get your false information from?