Dogswin? Did they go with the Freshman because "that's what typical Tech coaches do," or because the Junior got hurt in Game 3?
|
|
|
|
|
Dogswin? Did they go with the Freshman because "that's what typical Tech coaches do," or because the Junior got hurt in Game 3?
Higgins, but let Young try O-line.
Jordan Mills on choosing Tech:
“It’s a great experience seeing them play. It was a good atmosphere. The fans stood up the whole game and never sat down. They have a great fan base.”
Cliff, we've covered this a thousand times. Colby Cameron didn't do anything to distinguish himself until practically midway through his red shirt Junior year. In fact, he had some embarrassing performances as a redshirt sophomore (TX A&M game in College Station comes to mind). It wasn't until the 17-yr old freshman beat Colby out in fall practice that Colby FINALLY got religion and turned his game on during the 4th or 5th game of his redshirt Junior year.Originally Posted by DogsWin
Yes, we are all glad that Colby's game finally clicked. But the fact that he couldn't beat out a 17-year old freshman in fall camp in 2011 was on Colby, not anyone else.
T1, we have a senior QB with more collegiate experience than our entire QB roster combined. Not playing him at all today was just stupid. We can keep playing Higgins 100% of the time for experience, but it is ridiculous to expect a young QB not to make mistakes. Sharing that load with an experienced QB is a muuuuch smarter approach (unless of course the coach has a brand new contract and a convenient youth excuse). Again, I think Higgins will be a very good QB in time, but he isn't ready to shoulder 100% of the PT.
I think it's the perfect time to break him in. We all knew this was a rebuilding year. We lost 8 starters on offense and 7 on defense. This is a year of growth. PERFECT time to teach a young QB the ropes, imo. Sure it sucks to be mediocre-to-bad for a year, but I bet it will pay off in the long run.
I say Higgins. We left 20 points on the field today.
If it's between Higgins and Young, then Higgins. We moved the ball today (with Higgins) instead of being a 3-and-out machine (under Young). However, I know zero about this Harris kid, and based on what I've read from others on here I wouldn't be opposed to seeing him get some snaps.
Higgins plays well and we want to look elsewhere? Why start a senior who won't be here next year?
Read much? How did you read "get (Harris) some snaps" and think "start a senior (Harris)"?
Higgins...but without losing the ball inside the 5 yard line. Translated, this means to take care of the football.
Higgins is the man! Except for the fumble, he had a good game for his first game as a starter and being only a freshman. I feel much better about our season after seeing him play. Good arm with a quick release.
We do need an outside guy who can get open, but he has some good inside receivers now. He did a fair job of getting the ball to them. None of his passes wowed me, but he did fine.
I am surprised that I haven't seen more regarding the TD pass to HL. It was a bad throw to a wide open receiver. HL bailed him out big time.
We get it, you don't like Higgins. Give it a rest maddawg.
Never said that. I'm just not all excited about him. Now you give it a rest.
Higgins gives me more to be excited about than Young.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
