+ Reply to Thread
Page 2 of 10 FirstFirst 1234 ... LastLast
Results 16 to 30 of 148

Thread: Seedings at Conference Tourney

  1. #16
    2006 & 2011 BB&B Men's Bracket Champion (investigation underway) boxerdog has a reputation beyond reputeboxerdog has a reputation beyond reputeboxerdog has a reputation beyond reputeboxerdog has a reputation beyond reputeboxerdog has a reputation beyond reputeboxerdog has a reputation beyond reputeboxerdog has a reputation beyond reputeboxerdog has a reputation beyond reputeboxerdog has a reputation beyond reputeboxerdog has a reputation beyond reputeboxerdog has a reputation beyond repute
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Posts
    15,593

    Re: Seedings at Conference Tourney

    LaTech has the team NOBODY wants to play in the CUSA tourney.
    Have you considered those Dogs?

  2. #17
    Champ Dawg Fan has a brilliant futureDawg Fan has a brilliant futureDawg Fan has a brilliant futureDawg Fan has a brilliant futureDawg Fan has a brilliant futureDawg Fan has a brilliant futureDawg Fan has a brilliant futureDawg Fan has a brilliant futureDawg Fan has a brilliant futureDawg Fan has a brilliant futureDawg Fan has a brilliant future Dawg Fan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    1,616

    Re: Seedings at Conference Tourney

    Quote Originally Posted by Dawg06 View Post
    Despite what they said on the postgame show, the No. 1 seed/NIT auto bid is not quite sealed yet, especially with UTEP's inexplicable collapse and UAB's 3OT win. We do NOT want to have to wait two days to see how the tiebreaker process with UAB would shake out. Beat Southern Miss, and we enjoy Thursday night and get to relax on Saturday.
    Holy Smokes Batman! We do need to win out to ensure a #1 seed in the C-USA tournament and NIT auto bid. The logjam at #3 should break up since ODU and WKU still have a game against each other. We really need ODU to lose since we lost to them. UAB beating ODU, coupled with our loss to them, could potentially cost us the #1 seed if I am reading the tie-breaker rules correctly. I'm going to see if I can figure out all the possible scenarios. Look on page 9 of the PDF file at this link http://grfx.cstv.com/photos/schools/...se/release.pdf to see the tie breaker rules. I'm also posting the rules to determine the # 1 seed below:

    TWO-WAY TIE
    1. Regular season head-to-head results. If the tied teams split, then proceed to Step 2 below.
    2. Each team’s record vs. the team or tied teams occupying the highest position in the standings. Continue down through the standings until one team gains an advantage. When comparing records against a single team/ collective tied teams (before ties are broken), the following may apply:
    a. If the games played against the team or group are equal, winning percentage prevails.
    b. If the games played against the team or group are unequal, the following scenarios apply:
    1) Most wins prevail only if the team with fewer wins could not equal that win total if they played the same number of games. Two examples of many scenarios that do provide an advantage:
    1) Team A is 2-0 Team B is 0-1
    2) Team A is 3-0 Team B is 1-1
    2) Most wins do not prevail if the team with fewer wins could equal or surpass the win total of the other team. Two examples that do not provide an advantage:
    1) Team A is 1-1 Team B is 0-1
    2) Team A is 2-0 Team B is 1-0
    3) Fewer losses do not prevail if the teams have the same number of wins and if the team with fewer games could equal or surpass the loss total of the other team. Two examples of many scenarios that do not provide an advantage:
    1) Team A is 1-0 Team B is 1-1
    2) Team A is 0-1 Team B is 0-2
    If an advantage is not determined, proceed to the next team/group in the standings for comparison.
    If the tie cannot be broken after continuing down through the last team(s) in the standings, revert back to comparing records against the top teams in order by winning percentage, even if there is a comparison of unequal games. Only then, if the percentages are both 1.000, is 2-0 better than 1-0. However, the reverse is not true – no team gains advantage when are .000 (0-1 is never better than 0-2).


  3. #18
    Champ latech has a reputation beyond reputelatech has a reputation beyond reputelatech has a reputation beyond reputelatech has a reputation beyond reputelatech has a reputation beyond reputelatech has a reputation beyond reputelatech has a reputation beyond reputelatech has a reputation beyond reputelatech has a reputation beyond reputelatech has a reputation beyond reputelatech has a reputation beyond repute
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Albany, NY
    Posts
    5,595

    Re: Seedings at Conference Tourney

    For me: We just need to take care of our game against USM to claim the no. 1 seed and regular conference champ.
    We want ODU to beat WKU to put UTEP at 4 seed.
    This way we only have to face one of UAB/ODU not both to win the tourney if we get to the final.

  4. #19
    Champ dawg80 has a reputation beyond reputedawg80 has a reputation beyond reputedawg80 has a reputation beyond reputedawg80 has a reputation beyond reputedawg80 has a reputation beyond reputedawg80 has a reputation beyond reputedawg80 has a reputation beyond reputedawg80 has a reputation beyond reputedawg80 has a reputation beyond reputedawg80 has a reputation beyond reputedawg80 has a reputation beyond repute dawg80's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Posts
    44,287

    Re: Seedings at Conference Tourney

    Quote Originally Posted by latech View Post
    For me: We just need to take care of our game against USM to claim the no. 1 seed and regular conference champ.
    We want ODU to beat WKU to put UTEP at 4 seed.
    This way we only have to face one of UAB/ODU not both to win the tourney if we get to the final.
    That's it in a nutshell.

  5. #20
    Champ Dawg Fan has a brilliant futureDawg Fan has a brilliant futureDawg Fan has a brilliant futureDawg Fan has a brilliant futureDawg Fan has a brilliant futureDawg Fan has a brilliant futureDawg Fan has a brilliant futureDawg Fan has a brilliant futureDawg Fan has a brilliant futureDawg Fan has a brilliant futureDawg Fan has a brilliant future Dawg Fan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    1,616

    Re: Seedings at Conference Tourney

    Quote Originally Posted by latech View Post
    For me: We just need to take care of our game against USM to claim the no. 1 seed and regular conference champ.
    We want ODU to beat WKU to put UTEP at 4 seed.
    This way we only have to face one of UAB/ODU not both to win the tourney if we get to the final.
    Sounds good to me, especially the part about us beating USM.

  6. #21
    Champ skilldawg has a reputation beyond reputeskilldawg has a reputation beyond reputeskilldawg has a reputation beyond reputeskilldawg has a reputation beyond reputeskilldawg has a reputation beyond reputeskilldawg has a reputation beyond reputeskilldawg has a reputation beyond reputeskilldawg has a reputation beyond reputeskilldawg has a reputation beyond reputeskilldawg has a reputation beyond reputeskilldawg has a reputation beyond repute skilldawg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Posts
    7,120

    Re: Seedings at Conference Tourney

    This should be moot because we should crush USM... but here is how I think our seeding should be analyzed.

    We will be no worse than 2.

    We could fall to 2 if we tie with UAB and lose the tie-breakers.

    To tie with UAB, we have to lose to USM and UAB win both of their games this week.

    Since we split the season series, performance against the next highest seed will determine who is first and who is second.

    If ODU is seeded higher than UTEP, UAB is 1 because they beatODU and we lost to them.

    It UTEP is seeded higher than ODU, TECH is 1 because we beat UTEP twice and UAB lost their only match-up with UTEP.

    Of note, if UTEP and ODU finished tied, UTEP will be seeded higher based upon head to head victory. Western is not relevant for our seeding because UAB beat them as well.

  7. #22
    Champ RealityCheck has a reputation beyond reputeRealityCheck has a reputation beyond reputeRealityCheck has a reputation beyond reputeRealityCheck has a reputation beyond reputeRealityCheck has a reputation beyond reputeRealityCheck has a reputation beyond reputeRealityCheck has a reputation beyond reputeRealityCheck has a reputation beyond reputeRealityCheck has a reputation beyond reputeRealityCheck has a reputation beyond reputeRealityCheck has a reputation beyond repute
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Posts
    14,940

    Re: Seedings at Conference Tourney

    Quote Originally Posted by skilldawg View Post
    This should be moot because we should crush USM... but here is how I think our seeding should be analyzed.

    We will be no worse than 2.

    We could fall to 2 if we tie with UAB and lose the tie-breakers.

    To tie with UAB, we have to lose to USM and UAB win both of their games this week.

    Since we split the season series, performance against the next highest seed will determine who is first and who is second.

    If ODU is seeded higher than UTEP, UAB is 1 because they beatODU and we lost to them.

    It UTEP is seeded higher than ODU, TECH is 1 because we beat UTEP twice and UAB lost their only match-up with UTEP.

    Of note, if UTEP and ODU finished tied, UTEP will be seeded higher based upon head to head victory. Western is not relevant for our seeding because UAB beat them as well.
    Ties are broken in the standings from the top down, so a potential tie between ODU and UTEP would not be broken before the #1 and #2 seeds could be determined. The danger for Tech is if ODU sweeps Charlotte and WKU and UTEP loses one more to either North Texas or Rice.

  8. #23
    Big Dog 4 Life HoDo-Tech70 has a reputation beyond reputeHoDo-Tech70 has a reputation beyond reputeHoDo-Tech70 has a reputation beyond reputeHoDo-Tech70 has a reputation beyond reputeHoDo-Tech70 has a reputation beyond reputeHoDo-Tech70 has a reputation beyond reputeHoDo-Tech70 has a reputation beyond reputeHoDo-Tech70 has a reputation beyond reputeHoDo-Tech70 has a reputation beyond reputeHoDo-Tech70 has a reputation beyond reputeHoDo-Tech70 has a reputation beyond repute HoDo-Tech70's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    3,857

    Re: Seedings at Conference Tourney

    Quote Originally Posted by skilldawg View Post
    This should be moot because we should crush USM... but here is how I think our seeding should be analyzed.

    We will be no worse than 2.

    We could fall to 2 if we tie with UAB and lose the tie-breakers.

    To tie with UAB, we have to lose to USM and UAB win both of their games this week.

    Since we split the season series, performance against the next highest seed will determine who is first and who is second.

    If ODU is seeded higher than UTEP, UAB is 1 because they beatODU and we lost to them.

    It UTEP is seeded higher than ODU, TECH is 1 because we beat UTEP twice and UAB lost their only match-up with UTEP.

    Of note, if UTEP and ODU finished tied, UTEP will be seeded higher based upon head to head victory. Western is not relevant for our seeding because UAB beat them as well.
    We will not be lower than 2 but WE WILL be #1 when we beat USM. The other key issue is having UAB on the opposite side of the bracket. I'm not as worried about seeding of all the other teams. However, ODU doesn't worry me as much as facing UTEP a third time.

    If we take care of USM and UAB finishes #2 or #3, then we should get afternoon game times rather than being in the evening session. C-USA places the "home" team in the evening bracket for games played before the championship. Although UAB is not at their home arena, they will be in their hometown. I don't want to think "tired legs" is the reason for a loss.

  9. #24
    Puppy ccp017 is just really niceccp017 is just really niceccp017 is just really niceccp017 is just really niceccp017 is just really niceccp017 is just really niceccp017 is just really niceccp017 is just really niceccp017 is just really niceccp017 is just really nice ccp017's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    Monroe
    Posts
    60

    Re: Seedings at Conference Tourney

    Quote Originally Posted by Dawg Fan View Post
    Holy Smokes Batman! We do need to win out to ensure a #1 seed in the C-USA tournament and NIT auto bid. The logjam at #3 should break up since ODU and WKU still have a game against each other. We really need ODU to lose since we lost to them. UAB beating ODU, coupled with our loss to them, could potentially cost us the #1 seed if I am reading the tie-breaker rules correctly. I'm going to see if I can figure out all the possible scenarios. Look on page 9 of the PDF file at this link http://grfx.cstv.com/photos/schools/...se/release.pdf to see the tie breaker rules. I'm also posting the rules to determine the # 1 seed below:

    TWO-WAY TIE
    1. Regular season head-to-head results. If the tied teams split, then proceed to Step 2 below.
    2. Each team’s record vs. the team or tied teams occupying the highest position in the standings. Continue down through the standings until one team gains an advantage. When comparing records against a single team/ collective tied teams (before ties are broken), the following may apply:
    a. If the games played against the team or group are equal, winning percentage prevails.
    b. If the games played against the team or group are unequal, the following scenarios apply:
    1) Most wins prevail only if the team with fewer wins could not equal that win total if they played the same number of games. Two examples of many scenarios that do provide an advantage:
    1) Team A is 2-0 Team B is 0-1
    2) Team A is 3-0 Team B is 1-1
    2) Most wins do not prevail if the team with fewer wins could equal or surpass the win total of the other team. Two examples that do not provide an advantage:
    1) Team A is 1-1 Team B is 0-1
    2) Team A is 2-0 Team B is 1-0
    3) Fewer losses do not prevail if the teams have the same number of wins and if the team with fewer games could equal or surpass the loss total of the other team. Two examples of many scenarios that do not provide an advantage:
    1) Team A is 1-0 Team B is 1-1
    2) Team A is 0-1 Team B is 0-2
    If an advantage is not determined, proceed to the next team/group in the standings for comparison.
    If the tie cannot be broken after continuing down through the last team(s) in the standings, revert back to comparing records against the top teams in order by winning percentage, even if there is a comparison of unequal games. Only then, if the percentages are both 1.000, is 2-0 better than 1-0. However, the reverse is not true – no team gains advantage when are .000 (0-1 is never better than 0-2).

    Since we split the series with UAB, it should go on to the final tie breaker which would come down to comparing records by winning percentage. Since we have a higher winning percentage by far over UAB, we should have clinched the #1 seed Saturday. The second scenario only applies if it was an uneven series. Since we split, we have already gotten the #1 seed no matter what happens if I am reading this correctly.

  10. #25
    Super Moderator Tech77 has a reputation beyond reputeTech77 has a reputation beyond reputeTech77 has a reputation beyond reputeTech77 has a reputation beyond reputeTech77 has a reputation beyond reputeTech77 has a reputation beyond reputeTech77 has a reputation beyond reputeTech77 has a reputation beyond reputeTech77 has a reputation beyond reputeTech77 has a reputation beyond reputeTech77 has a reputation beyond repute Tech77's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Beautiful Lake Claiborne
    Posts
    19,162

    Re: Seedings at Conference Tourney

    Beat USM!
    Good old Memorial Gym

  11. #26
    Varsity Bulldog Black is a jewel in the roughBlack is a jewel in the roughBlack is a jewel in the roughBlack is a jewel in the roughBlack is a jewel in the roughBlack is a jewel in the roughBlack is a jewel in the roughBlack is a jewel in the roughBlack is a jewel in the roughBlack is a jewel in the roughBlack is a jewel in the rough
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    West Monroe, LA
    Posts
    470

    Re: Seedings at Conference Tourney

    JFW.

  12. #27
    Bulldog S'PortDawg is a jewel in the roughS'PortDawg is a jewel in the roughS'PortDawg is a jewel in the roughS'PortDawg is a jewel in the roughS'PortDawg is a jewel in the roughS'PortDawg is a jewel in the roughS'PortDawg is a jewel in the roughS'PortDawg is a jewel in the roughS'PortDawg is a jewel in the roughS'PortDawg is a jewel in the roughS'PortDawg is a jewel in the rough
    Join Date
    Oct 2014
    Location
    Shreveport
    Posts
    102

    Re: Seedings at Conference Tourney

    I can't believe UTEP lost to Southern Miss. Now, if ODU beats Western Kentucky, ODU will end up a 3 seed and have to play UAB on the other side of the bracket. That is HUGE, I had put our chances of beating both teams in the tournament at less than 50%. But if UAB or ODU can knock the other out, our chances of winning the tournament go up exponentially, IMO. Go Monarchs!

    Side note, I am taking Friday off of work in a couple weeks and driving to Birmingham from Shreveport to watch the semis and the finals of the Conference tourney. Seeing how well our team does with crowd support, just look at the Northwestern St. game, I hope more can do the same.

  13. #28
    Champ detltu has a reputation beyond reputedetltu has a reputation beyond reputedetltu has a reputation beyond reputedetltu has a reputation beyond reputedetltu has a reputation beyond reputedetltu has a reputation beyond reputedetltu has a reputation beyond reputedetltu has a reputation beyond reputedetltu has a reputation beyond reputedetltu has a reputation beyond reputedetltu has a reputation beyond repute
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Madisonville, LA
    Posts
    5,491

    Re: Seedings at Conference Tourney

    Quote Originally Posted by S'PortDawg View Post
    I can't believe UTEP lost to Southern Miss. Now, if ODU beats Western Kentucky, ODU will end up a 3 seed and have to play UAB on the other side of the bracket. That is HUGE, I had put our chances of beating both teams in the tournament at less than 50%. But if UAB or ODU can knock the other out, our chances of winning the tournament go up exponentially, IMO. Go Monarchs!

    Side note, I am taking Friday off of work in a couple weeks and driving to Birmingham from Shreveport to watch the semis and the finals of the Conference tourney. Seeing how well our team does with crowd support, just look at the Northwestern St. game, I hope more can do the same.
    Don't think I can make the Friday game, but if we make it to the championship game, I plan on being there.

  14. #29
    Hunter Lee's Hero HogDawg has a reputation beyond reputeHogDawg has a reputation beyond reputeHogDawg has a reputation beyond reputeHogDawg has a reputation beyond reputeHogDawg has a reputation beyond reputeHogDawg has a reputation beyond reputeHogDawg has a reputation beyond reputeHogDawg has a reputation beyond reputeHogDawg has a reputation beyond reputeHogDawg has a reputation beyond reputeHogDawg has a reputation beyond repute HogDawg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    McKinney, TX & Franklin, TN
    Posts
    36,774

    Re: Seedings at Conference Tourney

    Quote Originally Posted by boxerdog View Post
    LaTech has the team NOBODY wants to play in the CUSA tourney.
    I just hope we can play 3 games back-to-back without getting tired legs. And hopefully we'll have more than about 9 hours between our last 2 games this year. (That's still one of the stupidet things I've ever seen.)

  15. #30
    Champ RealityCheck has a reputation beyond reputeRealityCheck has a reputation beyond reputeRealityCheck has a reputation beyond reputeRealityCheck has a reputation beyond reputeRealityCheck has a reputation beyond reputeRealityCheck has a reputation beyond reputeRealityCheck has a reputation beyond reputeRealityCheck has a reputation beyond reputeRealityCheck has a reputation beyond reputeRealityCheck has a reputation beyond reputeRealityCheck has a reputation beyond repute
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Posts
    14,940

    Re: Seedings at Conference Tourney

    Quote Originally Posted by S'PortDawg View Post
    I can't believe UTEP lost to Southern Miss. Now, if ODU beats Western Kentucky, ODU will end up a 3 seed and have to play UAB on the other side of the bracket. That is HUGE, I had put our chances of beating both teams in the tournament at less than 50%. But if UAB or ODU can knock the other out, our chances of winning the tournament go up exponentially, IMO. Go Monarchs!

    Side note, I am taking Friday off of work in a couple weeks and driving to Birmingham from Shreveport to watch the semis and the finals of the Conference tourney. Seeing how well our team does with crowd support, just look at the Northwestern St. game, I hope more can do the same.
    UTEP is #3 seed over ODU if it beats both North Texas and Rice even if ODU sweeps Marshall and WKU due to UTEP's win over ODU. WKU would be #3 seed if it beats both Charlotte and ODU even if UTEP sweeps North Texas and Rice due to its win in Bowling Green over the Miners.

+ Reply to Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts