I think the latest leak (courtesy of New York Times) invalidates your entire argument on the reasons and such behind all the leaks, Guisslapp.
|
|
|
|
|
I think the latest leak (courtesy of New York Times) invalidates your entire argument on the reasons and such behind all the leaks, Guisslapp.
You will have to explain and tell me what leak you are referring to.Originally Posted by JuBru
It seems like Trump's incompetent leadership is starting to take its toll on our nation's security.
"Britain has suspended intelligence sharing on the Manchester bombing with the US after American officials leaked information to the media, an issue that British Prime Minister Theresa May will raise with US President Donald Trump later Thursday."
No, it is NOT "Trump's incompetent leadership" anything. It's the obummer/libtard hires in our Intelligence agencies trying to sabotage Trump's presidency. You are such a tool. Typical uninformed libtard.
But, I think Trump will root out these assholes, who are committing national security felonies, and when he does....oh, let me guess, the libtards will scream that Trump has fired these criminals "to protect himself" from....whatever they'll come up with that time. And you, Goose, will turn 180 degrees and join the chorus of attacking Trump for firing the people who you now are condemning. You don't know that's what you're doing, but you are, by attaching that ridiculous blame on Trump when it's bureaucraps (hired by obummer) who are doing what Britain, and others, are concerned about.
It's like speaking with a two-year-old when I have to respond to your posts.
I guess Obama didn't have any problems keeping the intel community in order.
Probably didn't help Trump that he came in insulting the intel community and sharing their intel with the Russians and did other things that seemed to lose their trust.
These days, the intel community is nothing more than a bunch of out of control, butt hurt libtards. I'd shit-can the whole lot of em if I were Trump.
This article was quite prescient. A good advisor could have warned Trump about this - or maybe they did and he didn't listen.
https://newrepublic.com/article/1393...ght-wing-roots
Exactly. Those in the Intel Community who are true Americans wouldn't sabotage any president. And of course, the libtards in the IC didn't want to damage obummer's tenure, so they behaved themselves. But now, they are all out to damage Trump because with libtards it's always politics first and the country be damned!.
And it is THIS behavior that the UK and others are referring to.
Goose-step can't comprehend this simple fact
Trump is in charge of the CIA. If he can't learn how to work with people, that is on him. Read the article I posted above. He started the relationship off on the wrong foot and then did things that continued to erode trust. Is that how effective leaders lead?
I'm not going to pretend to know everything about Judaism.
https://www.gotquestions.org/sects-of-Judaism.html
Sects of Judaism in the Modern Era
In the early part of the 18th century, Judaism began to fracture as modern approaches to Scripture and society emerged. The resulting sects of Judaism essentially divide modern Jews into three groups: Orthodox, Conservative, and Reform. As always, there are numerous smaller, less influential sects of Judaism, such as Torah Judaism and Reconstructionist Judaism. The overwhelming majority of Jews in the world are Orthodox, though Conservative and Reform are more common in the United States and certain parts of Europe.
Reform Judaism, which emerged in Germany the early 1800s, is by far the most theologically liberal sect. Reform Judaism is primarily an “ethical monotheism,” based on interpretation of traditional practices rather than strict adherence to them. Concepts such as prayers in Hebrew, kosher dietary laws, and the separation of genders during worship are rejected as irrelevant, or even backwards. The Scriptures, according to Reform Judaism, are human developments, subject to our interpretations and fallibilities.
In response to the rise of Reform Judaism, some Jews doubled down on the approach of Rabbinic Judaism, emphasizing traditional rituals, interpretations, and practices. Their core contention is that the Torah, handed down directly to Moses by God, is applicable in all ways and at all times. This group is today referred to as “Orthodox,” a term originally used as a criticism by more liberally minded Jews. Most practicing Jews in the world today, save for in the U.S. and parts of Europe, would be considered Orthodox.
The tension between liberal-leaning Reform and deeply conservative Orthodox resulted in the growth of the third major sect of Judaism, referred to as Conservative. This group is significantly more common in the United States. Conservative Judaism keeps to the laws of the Torah and Talmud, but with certain concessions made to modern cultural preferences. The key interest in Conservative Judaism is the centrality of religion and Jewish religious identity. Conservative Judaism maintains kosher dietary laws and the regular Sabbath but uses both local and Hebrew language for liturgy and does not separate genders during worship. Like Reform, however, Conservative Judaism does not see the Scriptures as inspired or inerrant.
You already know, made a comment, and came to the wrong conclusion.
Are you saying that someone from the intelligence community leaked details of the Manchester bombing to the New York Times to undermine Trump?
Yes. And not because of a moral duty or anything else you have argued.
How much aluminum foil are you stocking?
Yeah, I don't think this leak is anything like the ones against the administration, apart from the fact it is a leak. Did this source even ask to be kept anonymous?
But, no, I don't think this leak was disclosed over some moral duty.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote